Use Compiler.IRShow instead of Base.IRShow

[serenity4]

Otherwise, Base.IRShow methods end up requiring Base.Compiler types, which will be incompatible with any non-fallback Compiler implementation.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 76.86%. Comparing base (550a2a4) to head (73b5d3f).
Report is 44 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #132       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   88.69%   76.86%   -11.83%     
===========================================
  Files           6        6               
  Lines        1442     1526       +84     
===========================================
- Hits         1279     1173      -106     
- Misses        163      353      +190     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[aviatesk]

I think we can just use CC.IRShow now? CC.IRShow === Base.IRShow when CC === Base.Compiler.

[serenity4]

I thought so as well, but AFAIK pre-1.11 (before making Compiler its own package) IRShow was defined in Base but not in Compiler.

[aviatesk]

I see. Let's move as is then.