Personalize README.md

[terichadbourne]

There's an MVP readme provided for you, but you may want to personalize it by:

• adjusting the welcome section
• adding additional contact info for organizers (email, Twitter, etc.)
• calling for co-organizers to join you
• mentioning related Meetup groups that will be hosting your ProtoSchool events

[daijiale]

I have push a commit for a personalize README.md and a README-zh.md for chinese :ead6d85

Please double check the information related to you @bobjiang ，I'm afraid I might have made mistakes

By the way , I think it's better to lock the main branch and every commit need a new branch and pull request after review each other @terichadbourne @bobjiang ，what are your opinions?

[terichadbourne]

@daijaile In general I do recommend using new branches and PRs when working on a team, so that you have a chance to confirm you agree with each other's edits, but it's up to you as co-organizers to decide what process you'd like to follow. Although I have admin privileges across all repos, I won't be actively involved in your Beijing repo, so it's probably best not to mention me within your readme.

One suggestion regarding mentioning your meetups in your repo. It looks like the "Events Review" section is about past events. Would you like to add something about how you'll be planning and publicizing future events? For example, you could say that ProtoSchool meetups will be hosted by X and Y meetup groups (with links to the main group pages, not the past events) or that planning for events will take place in your issue queue (or both!). For example, the San Francisco chapter uses an issue for planning for the next workshop, and there's a link to the issue from the readme that encourages people to help with the planning. See ProtoSchool/san-francisco#1.
This is totally up to you and @bobjiang of course, just a suggestion.

[daijiale]

@daijaile In general I do recommend using new branches and PRs when working on a team, so that you have a chance to confirm you agree with each other's edits, but it's up to you as co-organizers to decide what process you'd like to follow. Although I have admin privileges across all repos, I won't be actively involved in your Beijing repo, so it's probably best not to mention me within your readme.

One suggestion regarding mentioning your meetups in your repo. It looks like the "Events Review" section is about past events. Would you like to add something about how you'll be planning and publicizing future events? For example, you could say that ProtoSchool meetups will be hosted by X and Y meetup groups (with links to the main group pages, not the past events) or that planning for events will take place in your issue queue (or both!). For example, the San Francisco chapter uses an issue for planning for the next workshop, and there's a link to the issue from the readme that encourages people to help with the planning. See ProtoSchool/san-francisco#1.
This is totally up to you and @bobjiang of course, just a suggestion.

Got it , I was going to have an area where I could put all the resources together for review，But it doesn't fit event info，I will add the event plan to be held later ，Thanks for suggestion