Who should the copyright holder be for licensed work?

[Aariq]

group-procedures/getting-credit.qmd

Lines 43 to 51 in f6da603

	## Licenses
	Our group uses the following licenses:
	- Code/software: [MIT](https://opensource.org/license/mit) or [GNU GPL](https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.en.html)
	- Data: [CC0](https://creativecommons.org/public-domain/cc0/)[^getting-credit-1]
	- Websites/course materials/other writing: [CC-BY](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

There aren't any guidelines here about who should be listed as the copyright holder in the license. For R packages, it should be "package authors", but what about something like course materials? Should it be something like "CCT Data Science Team" or should it be the authors of that material?

[Chris-Schnaufer]

We might also want to have something for the work we do for other groups/people. This also runs into citation (addressed in the same document). IMO licensing is something that needs to be negotiated; perhaps we can have a default license for this with a leading (preliminary) statement about working with them ahead of time.

[Aariq]

I'll also note that some licences (e.g. CC-BY) don't have a spot to mention authors

[KristinaRiemer]

I wonder if UA has any rules about this too?