[Pelis Agent Factory Advisor] Pelis Agent Factory Advisor Report - Agentic Workflow Opportunities

[github-actions[bot]]

📊 Executive Summary

The gh-aw-firewall repository demonstrates strong agentic workflow maturity (Level 4/5) with 14+ active workflows covering security, CI/CD, documentation, testing, and issue management. However, as a security-critical firewall tool with a complex architecture (Docker, iptables, Squid proxy), there are untapped opportunities for specialized domain-specific workflows that could further enhance automation, particularly in areas like log analysis, performance monitoring, code quality, and community engagement.

Key Finding: The repository excels at security and infrastructure workflows but has opportunities for continuous code quality and operational intelligence workflows inspired by Pelis Agent Factory patterns.

---

🎓 Patterns Learned from Pelis Agent Factory

Core Design Principles

1. Specialization > Generalization - Many focused agents outperform one monolithic agent
2. Guardrails Enable Innovation - Strict constraints (safe-outputs, network restrictions) make experimentation safe
3. Meta-agents Are Powerful - Agents that monitor other agents (Metrics Collector, Workflow Health Manager) provide critical observability
4. Trust But Verify - Continuous validation is essential (daily testing, security scanning)
5. Repository-Level Automation - Embedded agents have outsized impact on development velocity

Workflow Patterns Observed

Security & Compliance (directly applicable to firewall domain):

• Daily secrets scanning for exposed credentials
• Malicious code scanning for suspicious patterns
• Static analysis integration (zizmor, poutine, actionlint)
• Security-focused PR reviews with specific domain knowledge

Code Quality & Refactoring:

• Continuous Simplicity - daily cleanup of complexity in recent changes
• Duplicate code detection using semantic analysis
• Pattern detectors using AST analysis (ast-grep)
• Semantic function refactoring using code analysis tools

Testing & Validation:

• Test coverage improvers targeting security-critical paths
• CI pipeline optimization analyzers
• Multi-device/multi-environment testing
• Workflow health monitoring (meta-agent pattern)

Metrics & Analytics:

• Metrics Collector as "central nervous system" tracking all agent activity
• Portfolio Analyst for cost optimization (AI isn't free!)
• Audit workflows that inspect other workflows' performance

Trigger Strategy:

• Event-driven (issues, PRs, push) for reactive tasks
• Scheduled (daily, weekly) for proactive maintenance
• Conditional activation (skip-if-match) to prevent duplicate work
• Manual (workflow_dispatch) for on-demand capabilities

---

📋 Current Agentic Workflow Inventory

Workflow	Purpose	Trigger	Assessment
security-guard	Reviews PRs for security weakening (iptables, Squid, containers)	pull_request	✅ Excellent - domain-specific security knowledge
security-review	Security analysis workflow	Various	✅ Good security coverage
dependency-security-monitor	Tracks vulnerability remediation with deadlines	schedule, workflow_dispatch	✅ Proactive security management
test-coverage-improver	Weekly test improvements targeting security-critical paths	weekly	✅ Well-designed, security-focused
ci-doctor	Diagnoses CI failures	Various	✅ Valuable debugging assistant
ci-cd-gaps-assessment	Identifies CI/CD pipeline gaps	workflow_dispatch	✅ Proactive improvement
doc-maintainer	Keeps documentation synchronized	schedule, workflow_dispatch	✅ Essential for 18+ doc files
issue-monster	Assigns issues to Copilot agents strategically	issues, schedule	✅ Smart issue triage
issue-duplication-detector	Finds duplicate issues	issues, schedule	✅ Reduces noise
release	Automates release process	Various	✅ Critical automation
update-release-notes	Generates release notes	workflow_dispatch	✅ Streamlines releases
plan	Planning agent for complex tasks	workflow_dispatch	✅ Strategic planning support
smoke-claude/copilot	Engine smoke tests	Various	✅ Quality assurance
pelis-agent-factory-advisor	Meta-agent analyzing workflow opportunities	workflow_dispatch	🎯 This workflow!

Standard GitHub Actions: build, codeql, container-scan, dependency-audit, deploy-docs, lint, pr-title, various test workflows

---

🚀 Actionable Recommendations

P0 - Implement Immediately

Firewall Log Intelligence Agent

What: Daily automated analysis of Squid access logs and iptables kernel logs to detect anomalies, attack patterns, and firewall effectiveness metrics.

Why:

• This is a security-critical firewall tool - log analysis is core functionality
• Squid logs capture all L7 traffic with allow/deny decisions
• iptables logs capture blocked non-HTTP traffic (potential exfiltration attempts)
• Current state: Logs exist (/tmp/squid-logs-*, kernel buffer) but no automated analysis
• Pattern from Pelis: "Metrics Collector" pattern - gather operational intelligence

How:

---
description: Daily analysis of firewall logs to detect anomalies and generate security intelligence
on:
  schedule: daily
  workflow_dispatch:
permissions:
  contents: read
  issues: write
tools:
  bash: [cat, grep, awk, jq]
safe-outputs:
  create-issue:
    title-prefix: "[Firewall Intelligence] "
  add-comment: {}
timeout-minutes: 10
---

# Firewall Log Intelligence Agent

Analyze firewall logs from CI test runs and generate security intelligence:

1. **Collect logs**: Parse recent workflow run artifacts containing Squid logs
2. **Detect anomalies**: 
   - Unusual blocked domains (potential exfiltration attempts)
   - High volume denials (misconfigured allowlist?)
   - Suspicious user agents
   - Timing patterns (rapid-fire requests)
3. **Generate metrics**:
   - Top blocked domains
   - Allow/deny ratio trends
   - Most active workflows
4. **Create report**: Generate discussion with findings and recommendations

Effort: Low (2-3 hours) - Logs already exist, just need parsing and analysis
Impact: High - Core security intelligence for a firewall tool

---

Performance Profiler Agent

What: Weekly analysis of container startup time, proxy latency, and resource consumption to detect performance regressions.

Why:

• Firewall adds overhead to every network request - performance is critical
• Current state: No automated performance tracking
• Pattern from Pelis: "Portfolio Analyst" - identify cost/performance issues before they become problems
• Integration tests run frequently but don't track performance trends

How:

---
description: Weekly performance analysis to detect regressions in container startup and proxy latency
on:
  schedule: weekly
  workflow_dispatch:
permissions:
  actions: read
  contents: read
tools:
  github: [default]
  bash: [time, date, jq]
safe-outputs:
  create-discussion:
    title-prefix: "[Performance Report] "
timeout-minutes: 15
---

# Performance Profiler Agent

Analyze recent workflow runs to track performance metrics:

1. **Extract metrics** from test logs:
   - Container startup time (docker-compose up duration)
   - First request latency
   - Memory/CPU consumption
2. **Compare against baseline**: Track trends over last 10 runs
3. **Identify regressions**: Flag >10% slowdowns
4. **Generate report**: Weekly performance dashboard in discussion

Effort: Medium (4-6 hours) - Requires parsing workflow logs and tracking trends
Impact: High - Prevents performance regressions in critical infrastructure

---

P1 - Plan for Near-Term

Continuous Simplicity Agent

What: Daily workflow that analyzes recently modified TypeScript code and creates PRs with simplifications (inspired by Pelis Factory's "Automatic Code Simplifier").

Why:

• Complex codebase: Docker, iptables, TypeScript, Squid configuration
• Rapid development can introduce complexity
• Pattern from Pelis: "Continuous Simplicity" - clean up after development sessions
• Current state: Manual code reviews catch some issues, but systematic cleanup is missing

How:

---
description: Daily code simplification for recently modified files
on:
  schedule: daily
  workflow_dispatch:
  skip-if-match:
    query: 'is:pr is:open in:title "[Code Simplification]"'
    max: 1
permissions:
  contents: read
  pull-requests: read
tools:
  github: [default]
  bash: [git, npm]
safe-outputs:
  create-pull-request:
    draft: true
    title-prefix: "[Code Simplification] "
timeout-minutes: 20
---

# Continuous Simplicity Agent

Analyze recently modified TypeScript code and propose simplifications:

1. **Find recent changes**: Last 5 commits on main branch
2. **Analyze patterns**:
   - Nested conditionals → early returns
   - Repeated logic → helper functions
   - Complex boolean expressions → named variables
   - Verbose error handling → consistent patterns
3. **Prioritize security-critical files**: src/host-iptables.ts, src/squid-config.ts
4. **Create PR**: One focused simplification per PR

Effort: Medium (6-8 hours to adapt Pelis template to TypeScript)
Impact: Medium-High - Improves maintainability over time

---

Integration Test Health Monitor

What: Track flaky tests, slow tests, and test performance degradation across integration test runs.

Why:

• Integration tests are critical for firewall functionality
• Current state: Tests run, but no trend analysis
• Pattern from Pelis: "CI Coach" - optimize test infrastructure
• Flaky tests in Docker/iptables environments are common but hard to diagnose

How:

---
description: Monitor integration test health and identify flaky/slow tests
on:
  workflow_run:
    workflows: ["Integration Tests"]
    types: [completed]
  schedule: weekly
permissions:
  actions: read
  issues: write
safe-outputs:
  create-issue:
    title-prefix: "[Test Health] "
timeout-minutes: 10
---

# Integration Test Health Monitor

Analyze integration test runs to identify health issues:

1. **Collect test results**: Parse last 20 integration test runs
2. **Identify flaky tests**: Tests that fail <30% of the time
3. **Track slow tests**: Tests taking >60s (Docker operations)
4. **Detect trends**: Tests getting slower over time
5. **Create issues**: One issue per problem with reproduction data

Effort: Medium (5-7 hours) - Requires parsing test results and tracking history
Impact: Medium - Improves CI reliability

---

Community Onboarding Bot

What: Welcome new contributors with repository-specific context, link to relevant docs, and offer to answer questions.

Why:

• Complex security tool with steep learning curve (Docker, iptables, Squid)
• Pattern from Pelis: "Teamwork & Culture" workflows - build community
• Current state: No automated onboarding
• 18+ documentation files - new contributors need guidance

How:

---
description: Welcome new contributors and provide onboarding resources
on:
  pull_request:
    types: [opened]
  issues:
    types: [opened]
permissions:
  issues: read
  pull-requests: read
tools:
  github: [default]
safe-outputs:
  add-comment:
    max: 1
timeout-minutes: 5
---

# Community Onboarding Bot

Welcome new contributors and provide context:

1. **Detect first-time contributors**: Check if author has previous PRs/issues
2. **Analyze contribution**: Is it security-related? Documentation? Tests?
3. **Provide resources**:
   - Link to AGENTS.md for development workflow
   - Link to relevant docs (security.md, architecture.md, troubleshooting.md)
   - Explain testing requirements
4. **Offer help**: Mention that agents can assist with questions

Effort: Low (2-4 hours) - Simple logic with welcoming message
Impact: Medium - Improves contributor experience

---

P2 - Consider for Roadmap

Dependency Update Assistant

What: Proactively test dependency updates in isolated PRs with full test suite validation.

Why:

• Current state: dependency-security-monitor tracks vulnerabilities, but no proactive update testing
• Pattern from Pelis: Automate manual toil
• Security-critical tool needs timely updates but with thorough testing

How: Create PRs that update one dependency at a time, run full test suite, and report compatibility issues.

Effort: Medium-High (8-10 hours) - Requires npm update automation and result analysis
Impact: Medium - Keeps dependencies current with lower risk

---

Code Complexity Tracker

What: Weekly analysis of cyclomatic complexity trends to identify files becoming unmaintainable.

Why:

• Pattern from Pelis: "Metrics Collector" - track quality metrics over time
• Security-critical code should remain simple
• Current state: No complexity tracking

How: Use complexity analysis tools (e.g., complexity-report for TypeScript) to track trends and create issues when complexity exceeds thresholds.

Effort: Low-Medium (4-6 hours) - Tools exist, just need workflow wrapper
Impact: Low-Medium - Preventive maintenance

---

Breaking Change Detector

What: Analyze PRs to identify potential breaking changes in CLI API, Docker image interfaces, or configuration formats.

Why:

• Published npm package and Docker images - breaking changes affect users
• Pattern from Pelis: "Breaking Change Checker"
• Current state: Manual review only

How: Analyze changes to src/cli.ts, action.yml, Docker Compose template, and flag potential breaking changes in PR comments.

Effort: Medium (6-8 hours) - Requires API surface analysis
Impact: Medium - Prevents user-facing breakage

---

P3 - Future Ideas

Multi-Environment Matrix Testing

What: Automated testing across different Docker versions, iptables versions, and Linux distributions.

Why:

• Firewall relies on specific Docker/iptables behavior
• Current state: Tests run on single environment (Ubuntu 22.04)
• Pattern from Pelis: "Multi-Device Docs Tester" - validate across environments

Effort: High (12+ hours) - Requires CI matrix configuration and environment setup
Impact: Low-Medium - Catches compatibility issues but adds CI cost

---

Documentation Quality Checker

What: Validate that code examples in documentation actually work and are up-to-date.

Why:

• 18+ documentation files with many code examples
• Pattern from Pelis: Continuous validation
• Current state: Manual verification only

Effort: Medium-High (8-10 hours) - Extract and execute examples from markdown
Impact: Low-Medium - Improves documentation quality

---

📈 Maturity Assessment

Current Level: 4/5 - Advanced

Strengths:

• ✅ Comprehensive security workflow coverage (security-guard, security-review, codeql, container-scan, dependency-security-monitor)
• ✅ Strong CI/CD automation (ci-doctor, ci-cd-gaps-assessment, multiple test workflows)
• ✅ Proactive maintenance (test-coverage-improver, doc-maintainer, release automation)
• ✅ Meta-workflow awareness (pelis-agent-factory-advisor, plan agent)
• ✅ Issue management (issue-monster, issue-duplication-detector)

Gaps to reach Level 5:

• ⚠️ No operational intelligence workflows (log analysis, performance monitoring)
• ⚠️ No continuous code quality workflows (simplification, complexity tracking)
• ⚠️ Limited metrics/analytics (no workflow health monitoring, cost tracking)
• ⚠️ No community engagement workflows (onboarding, contributor assistance)

Target Level: 5/5 - Comprehensive automation with operational intelligence

Gap Analysis: Adding P0 workflows (Firewall Log Intelligence, Performance Profiler) would unlock Level 5 by providing operational intelligence specific to this firewall's domain. These workflows leverage the unique artifacts (Squid logs, performance metrics) that this repository generates but doesn't yet analyze systematically.

---

🔄 Comparison with Best Practices

What gh-aw-firewall Does Well

✅ Security-First Mindset: security-guard workflow demonstrates deep domain knowledge (iptables, Squid, containers) - exemplary security review automation

✅ Test-Driven Quality: test-coverage-improver targets security-critical paths - shows understanding of risk-based testing

✅ Release Discipline: Automated release workflow with notes generation - professional software delivery

✅ Meta-Awareness: Has pelis-agent-factory-advisor (this workflow!) and plan agent - demonstrates self-improvement capability

Areas for Improvement

⚠️ Operational Intelligence Gap: Unlike Pelis Factory's "Metrics Collector" pattern, no workflows analyze the operational data this firewall generates (logs, performance metrics)

⚠️ Code Quality Automation: Missing "Continuous Simplicity" pattern - could benefit from daily code cleanup workflows

⚠️ Cost/Performance Tracking: No "Portfolio Analyst" equivalent - Docker containers and AI agents have costs that should be monitored

Unique Opportunities for This Domain

🎯 Firewall-Specific Workflows: As a security tool, this repository can benefit from workflows that other projects don't need:

• Log analysis for attack pattern detection
• Performance profiling (firewall overhead monitoring)
• Configuration validation (iptables rules, Squid ACLs)
• Threat intelligence (analyzing blocked domains)

🎯 Security Research Platform: The logs and metrics from this firewall could feed research into AI agent behavior and security patterns

---

📝 Implementation Guidance

Quick Wins (Next 2 Weeks)

1. Firewall Log Intelligence Agent (P0) - 2-3 hours

   • Start with simple log parsing from test artifacts
   • Generate weekly summary discussion
   • Iterate based on findings

2. Community Onboarding Bot (P1) - 2-4 hours

   • Welcome message for first-time contributors
   • Link to relevant documentation
   • Low effort, high impact on contributor experience

Medium-Term (Next Month)

3. Performance Profiler Agent (P0) - 4-6 hours
4. Continuous Simplicity Agent (P1) - 6-8 hours
5. Integration Test Health Monitor (P1) - 5-7 hours

Long-Term (Next Quarter)

6. Dependency Update Assistant (P2)
7. Code Complexity Tracker (P2)
8. Breaking Change Detector (P2)

Resources

• Templates: Use gh aw add to import workflows from Pelis Factory as starting points
• Testing: All workflows should include workflow_dispatch trigger for manual testing
• Iteration: Start with read-only analysis, evolve to PR-based changes once proven valuable
• Cost Management: Use skip-if-match to prevent duplicate work and control AI costs

---

🗂️ Notes for Future Runs

Stored in /tmp/gh-aw/cache-memory/:

• pelis-patterns.md - Patterns learned from Pelis Agent Factory documentation
• gh-aw-firewall-analysis.md - Current state analysis of this repository
• recommendations.md - Draft recommendations (basis for this discussion)

Changes to Track:

• Workflow additions/removals
• Coverage improvements (currently ~20% for docker-manager.ts)
• Performance trends (track if P0 Performance Profiler is implemented)
• Issue/PR activity patterns

Next Review: Suggest running this advisor again in 3 months to:

• Assess which recommendations were implemented
• Measure impact of new workflows
• Identify new opportunities based on repository evolution

---

🎯 Conclusion

The gh-aw-firewall repository demonstrates strong agentic workflow maturity with excellent security coverage. The recommended workflows focus on operational intelligence (log analysis, performance monitoring) and continuous quality (code simplification, test health) - areas where this repository can learn from Pelis Factory patterns while staying true to its security-critical firewall domain.

Immediate Action: Implement the two P0 workflows (Firewall Log Intelligence, Performance Profiler) to unlock operational intelligence capabilities that are uniquely valuable for a network firewall tool.

---

This analysis was generated by the Pelis Agent Factory Advisor workflow. For questions or to request a re-analysis, trigger this workflow with workflow_dispatch.

AI generated by Pelis Agent Factory Advisor

• expires on Feb 1, 2026, 8:58 PM UTC

[github-actions[bot]]

This discussion was automatically closed because it expired on 2026-02-01T20:58:03.422Z.