[Pelis Agent Factory Advisor] Agentic Workflow Maturity Assessment and Recommendations #425
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it expired on 2026-02-02T21:00:33.295Z. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
📊 Executive Summary
After analyzing gh-aw-firewall against Pelis Agent Factory best practices, this repository demonstrates strong agentic workflow maturity (Level 4/5) with 15 active workflows covering security, quality, documentation, and CI/CD. The repository excels at security automation and CI failure investigation but has opportunities to add code quality workflows, metrics collection, and documentation validation - all proven patterns from the Pelis Agent Factory collection of 100+ workflows.
Key Strengths: Comprehensive security guard, automated CI diagnosis, test coverage improvement, dependency monitoring
Top Opportunities: Code simplification, metrics collector, documentation site testing, glossary maintenance
Quick Wins: 3 workflows could be added immediately with minimal effort and high impact
🎓 Patterns Learned from Pelis Agent Factory
Core Design Principles
Workflow Categories (19 articles in "Meet the Workflows" series)
Key Configuration Patterns from Pelis Factory
Comparison: gh-aw-firewall workflows follow these patterns well, with good use of
skip-if-match, title prefixes, and network restrictions. Could benefit from moreimportsfor shared logic.📋 Current Agentic Workflow Inventory
Total: 15 agentic workflows
Active (with triggers): ~10
Needing activation: ~5
🚀 Actionable Recommendations
P0 - Implement Immediately (High Impact, Low Effort)
1. Code Simplification Workflow
What: Daily analysis of recent commits to find overcomplicated code and create PRs with simplifications
Why:
How: Adapt Pelis Factory's Automatic Code Simplifier
Effort: Low (2-3 hours to adapt from Pelis Factory)
Example: Could have simplified complex iptables rule generation in
host-iptables.ts2. Documentation Site Validator
What: Daily validation that docs-site examples are accurate and links work
Why:
How: Create workflow to verify docs-site content
Effort: Low (1-2 hours)
Impact: High - accurate docs critical for security tool adoption
3. Glossary/Terminology Maintainer
What: Maintains consistent terminology across docs, code comments, and README
Why:
How: Create glossary and monitor for drift
Effort: Low (1-2 hours + initial glossary creation)
Impact: Medium - improves professionalism and clarity
P1 - Plan for Near-Term (High Impact, Medium Effort)
4. Metrics Collector for Agent Ecosystem
What: Meta-agent that tracks all workflow runs, costs, success rates, and generates weekly reports
Why:
How: Adapt Pelis Factory's Metrics Collector
Effort: Medium (4-6 hours to implement)
Impact: High - enables data-driven optimization
5. Duplicate Code Detector with Semantic Analysis
What: Weekly scan for duplicated logic across TypeScript files using semantic code analysis
Why:
How: Adapt Duplicate Code Detector
Effort: Medium (3-4 hours)
Impact: Medium - improves maintainability
6. Documentation Site Multi-Device Tester
What: Weekly Playwright tests of docs-site across mobile, tablet, desktop
Why:
How: Use Playwright in workflow
Effort: Medium (4-6 hours with Playwright setup)
Impact: Medium - professional documentation quality
P2 - Consider for Roadmap (Medium Impact)
7. Security Compliance Campaign Tracker
What: Track vulnerability remediation campaigns with deadlines and progress reporting
Why:
How: Campaign-based issue tracking with deadlines
Effort: High (6-8 hours)
Impact: Medium - useful during security audits
8. Performance Monitoring for Firewall Operations
What: Weekly analysis of firewall overhead, container startup times, proxy latency
Why:
How: Benchmark workflows with metrics extraction
Effort: High (8+ hours with benchmarking setup)
Impact: Medium - optimize performance
9. Network Traffic Pattern Analyzer
What: Weekly analysis of Squid logs to identify common domain patterns and suggest additions to documentation
Why:
How: Parse Squid logs from test runs
Effort: High (6-8 hours)
Impact: Low-Medium - insights rather than automation
P3 - Future Ideas
10. Continuous Refactoring Workflow
What: Weekly structural improvements beyond simplification (extract modules, improve abstractions)
Why: Complement code simplifier with deeper refactoring
Effort: High
Impact: Medium
11. Multi-Phase Test Coverage Campaign
What: Long-running (multi-week) campaign to systematically achieve 90%+ coverage
Why: Pelis Factory pattern for complex coordinated work
Effort: High
Impact: Medium (test-coverage-improver already exists)
12. Organization-Wide Workflow Syncer
What: If multiple repos use awf, sync common workflows
Why: Pelis Factory has org-wide patterns
Effort: High
Impact: Low (only relevant if ecosystem grows)
📈 Maturity Assessment
Current Level: 4/5 (Advanced)
Rating Scale:
What it Does Well ✅
What it Could Improve 🔧
Target Level: 5/5 (Agent Factory)
To achieve Level 5:
Gap Analysis
🔄 Comparison with Best Practices
Strengths Compared to Pelis Factory
Unique Opportunities (Security/Firewall Domain)
Adoption Recommendations
From Pelis Factory proven patterns, prioritize:
📝 Notes for Future Runs
Patterns Observed (stored in cache-memory):
Changes to Track:
Next Assessment Should Check:
🎯 Implementation Roadmap
Week 1-2: Quick Wins (P0)
Month 1: High-Impact Features (P1)
Quarter 1: Advanced Features (P2)
Ongoing
📚 References
Generated by Pelis Agent Factory Advisor • 2026-01-26
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions