Skip to content

Standalone, portable specification of BIR syntax and semantics #105

@palmskog

Description

@palmskog

The BIR language and its semantics could be worth specifying and documenting standalone, most directly using Lem. Encoding BIR in Lem would also allow porting it to other proof assistants like Isabelle/HOL and Coq.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions