Skip to content
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Nearly forgot to comment here after our extensive discussion on IRC! Just confirming that we’re unable to support DANE because of the underlying DNSSEC requirement, which is kind of a deal-breaker across a shared eTLD with a potentially infinite number of zones and no reliable way of managing the required DS records. If DNSimple ever supports automated DS record management then I’ll look into it, but as of today it doesn’t appear that there would be any sane way of managing DANE support.

Replies: 1 comment 1 reply

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
@Mar0xy
Comment options

Answer selected by newbold
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Ideas
Labels
dns Related to omg.lol’s DNS service
2 participants