Fix cosmetic issues in repo stats display (#160)

## Summary
- Cherry-picked addressed/unaddressed review counts feature (`b623862`,
`28d1161`)
- Fixed misaligned output labels in `repo show` so all review stat
numbers align at the same column
- Fixed inconsistent struct field type alignment in `RepoStats`
- Added test coverage for `AddressedReviews` and `UnaddressedReviews`
fields in `TestGetRepoStats`

<img width="331" height="252" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f15419ed-e9a1-4cbb-bbce-4eb513105c76"
/>


## Test plan
- [x] `go test ./internal/storage/ -run TestGetRepoStats` passes
- [x] Verify `roborev repo show` output alignment visually

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Author: wesm

cmd/roborev/repo.go

@@ -186,10 +186,10 @@ Examples:
 				fmt.Printf("  Failed:   %d\n", stats.FailedJobs)
 			}
 			fmt.Println()
-			fmt.Printf("Reviews:    %d total\n", stats.PassedReviews+stats.FailedReviews)
-			fmt.Printf("  Passed:   %d\n", stats.PassedReviews)
-			fmt.Printf("  Failed:   %d\n", stats.FailedReviews)
-			fmt.Printf("  Addressed: %d\n", stats.AddressedReviews)
+			fmt.Printf("Reviews:    %d total\n", stats.AddressedReviews+stats.UnaddressedReviews)
+			fmt.Printf("  Passed:      %d\n", stats.PassedReviews)
+			fmt.Printf("  Failed:      %d\n", stats.FailedReviews)
+			fmt.Printf("  Addressed:   %d\n", stats.AddressedReviews)
 			fmt.Printf("  Unaddressed: %d\n", stats.UnaddressedReviews)
 
 			return nil

internal/storage/repos.go

@@ -348,9 +348,9 @@ type RepoStats struct {
 	RunningJobs   int
 	CompletedJobs int
 	FailedJobs    int
-	PassedReviews     int
-	FailedReviews     int
-	AddressedReviews  int
+	PassedReviews      int
+	FailedReviews      int
+	AddressedReviews   int
 	UnaddressedReviews int
 }
 

internal/storage/repos_test.go

@@ -637,6 +637,35 @@ func TestGetRepoStats(t *testing.T) {
 		if stats.FailedReviews != 1 {
 			t.Errorf("Expected 1 failed review, got %d", stats.FailedReviews)
 		}
+		// Both reviews should be unaddressed by default
+		if stats.AddressedReviews != 0 {
+			t.Errorf("Expected 0 addressed reviews, got %d", stats.AddressedReviews)
+		}
+		if stats.UnaddressedReviews != 2 {
+			t.Errorf("Expected 2 unaddressed reviews, got %d", stats.UnaddressedReviews)
+		}
+	})
+
+	t.Run("addressed reviews counted", func(t *testing.T) {
+		// Mark job1's review as addressed
+		review, err := db.GetReviewByJobID(job1.ID)
+		if err != nil {
+			t.Fatalf("GetReviewByJobID failed: %v", err)
+		}
+		if err := db.MarkReviewAddressed(review.ID, true); err != nil {
+			t.Fatalf("MarkReviewAddressed failed: %v", err)
+		}
+
+		stats, err := db.GetRepoStats(repo.ID)
+		if err != nil {
+			t.Fatalf("GetRepoStats failed: %v", err)
+		}
+		if stats.AddressedReviews != 1 {
+			t.Errorf("Expected 1 addressed review, got %d", stats.AddressedReviews)
+		}
+		if stats.UnaddressedReviews != 1 {
+			t.Errorf("Expected 1 unaddressed review, got %d", stats.UnaddressedReviews)
+		}
 	})
 
 	t.Run("nonexistent repo", func(t *testing.T) {