And even more Vinaya issues

[brahmali]

From Ven. Nadī (ex-Tracy):

So, html! I’m sure there’s method to the madness, but in case not… The inserted heading in section 3 e.g. 5.5.0 “Male lay followers” appears in larger font than those in sections 4, 8, 12 e.g. 6.2.0 “A monk sending a message”.
I see this in the html file:

"pli-tv-kd3:5.5.0": "<h3 class='inserted-heading'>{}</h3>",
...
"pli-tv-kd3:6.2.0": "<h5 class='inserted-heading help-heading'>{}</h5>", And comparison with other kds so far, all the inserted headings in [kd1](https://suttacentral.net/pli-tv-kd1/en/brahmali#pli-tv-kd1undefined) and [kd4](https://suttacentral.net/pli-tv-kd4/en/brahmali#pli-tv-kd4undefined) are h3.

---

Kd 4:5.4.13, 5.4.21 html: These are not boldfaced while in [kd2](https://suttacentral.net/pli-tv-kd2/en/brahmali#pli-tv-kd2undefined) (26.3.6, 26.4.1) they are. Similarly boldfacing and paragraphing differences with Kd 4:5.6.1-5.6.17 vs [kd2:26.6.1](https://suttacentral.net/pli-tv-kd2/en/brahmali#pli-tv-kd2:26.6.1)-26.7.7.

Solution: follow the Kd 4 pattern for Kd 2.

---

Kd 4:16.2.4-5 html: these are part of the same paragraph as the previous segment, and the entire paragraph has “rule” formatting. However in [kd19:2.1.8](https://suttacentral.net/pli-tv-kd19/en/brahmali#pli-tv-kd19:2.1.8)-9, the same two segments are their own paragraph and do not have “rule” format.

Solution: let's follow the structure in Kd 19. The reason is we want the actual rule to stand out, and we do not want too much bold in the text.

---

Kd 4:16.2.10 html: this is its own paragraph while in [kd19:2.1.11](https://suttacentral.net/pli-tv-kd19/en/brahmali#pli-tv-kd19:2.1.11) that sentence is in the same segment as the previous text. In both, that sentence still has “kamma” formatting.

Solution: follow pattern in Kd 4, that is, make it it's own paragraph. Then remove kamma formatting on both. Again, we want have formatting strictly for what is a sanghakamma and minimise the use of bold/semibold.

[brahmali]

At Kd 12:9.1.26 to 9.1.73 there is a problem with the enumeration of the factors. As it is, it ends with number 108 instead of the correct number which is 93. The list should look like the one at Kd 12:5.1.25 to 5.1.90.

[brahmali]

OK, more! Now Kd 7:

Remove paragraph break between segments 1.2.1 and 1.2.2. (https://bilara.suttacentral.net/translation/pli-tv-kd7_translation-en-brahmali:1.2.1)

[brahmali]

pli-tv-kd10:5.6.30 starts a new paragraph, but should be part of previous.

[brahmali]

pli-tv-kd11:33.1.45: remove hr after this segment.

pli-tv-kd13:29.2.20: add hr after this segment.

[brahmali]

pli-tv-kd1:23.7.1 and 23.10.7 should be in the same paragraph.

pli-tv-kd1:25.11.3 and 32.3.22: remove new paragraph.

pli-tv-kd1:33.1.15 and 33.1.16 should be in the same paragraph.

pli-tv-kd3:5.10.0: "Improper cancellation of the invitation" > "Female lay followers, etc."

pli-tv-kd11:33.1.69.22: "He shouldn’t stay in the same room in a monastery as a regular monk." > "He shouldn’t, in a monastery, stay in the same room as a regular monk."

pli-tv-kd11:33.1.69.23: "He shouldn’t stay in the same room in a non-monastery as a regular monk." > "He shouldn’t, in a non-monastery, stay in the same room as a regular monk."

pli-tv-kd11:33.1.69.24: "He shouldn’t stay in the same room in a monastery or a non-monastery as a regular monk." > "He shouldn’t, in a monastery or a non-monastery, stay in the same room as a regular monk."

pli-tv-kd11:34.2.8: "he stays in the same room in a monastery as a regular monk; he stays in the same room in a non-monastery as a regular monk; he stays in the same room in a monastery or a non-monastery as a regular monk;" > "he stays in a monastery in the same room as a regular monk; he stays in a non-monastery in the same room as a regular monk; he stays in a monastery or a non-monastery in the same room as a regular monk;"

pli-tv-kd11:34.2.20: "he doesn’t stay in the same room in a monastery as a regular monk; he doesn’t stay in the same room in a non-monastery as a regular monk; he doesn’t stay in the same room in a monastery or a non-monastery as a regular monk;" > "he doesn’t, in a monastery, stay in the same room as a regular monk; he doesn’t, in a non-monastery, stay in the same room as a regular monk; he doesn’t, in a monastery or a non-monastery, stay in the same room as a regular monk;"

pli-tv-kd14:4.5.1: add paragraph break before this segment.

pli-tv-kd14:12.2.2.2 to 14.2.2.11: "not properly resolved" > "improperly disposed of"

pli-tv-kd14:12.3.2.2 to 14.3.2.11: "properly resolved" > "properly disposed of"

pli-tv-kd14:14.10.0: move the content of this segment up one, so that is appears before segment pli-tv-kd14:14.9.18.

pli-tv-kd14:14.33.18 to pli-tv-kd14:14.33.21: add class='kamma'.

pli-tv-kd14:14.33.23 to pli-tv-kd14:14.33.26: add class='kamma'.

pli-tv-kd14:14.33.41.2: "Venerables" > "venerables" + "If it seems appropriate to the Sangha" > "If the Sangha is ready"

pli-tv-kd14:14.33.41.3: "Venerables" > "venerables"

pli-tv-kd14:14.33.43 to pli-tv-kd14:14.33.61 merge into a single paragraph.

Kd part 2, introduction:
“offences" > “offenses” x3
“instead listed at the beginning,.” remove comma.

Bu Pc 1: Remove paragraph between segments 2.69 and 2.6.10.

[brahmali]

pli-tv-bu-vb-np1:3.2.20-3.2.22: change class from "kamma" to "formal-statement"
pli-tv-bu-vb-np21:3.31-3.33: change class from "kamma" to "formal-statement"