Skip to content

Implement formal safety framework with 7 provable theorems#1

Draft
Copilot wants to merge 5 commits intomainfrom
copilot/add-formal-safety-framework
Draft

Implement formal safety framework with 7 provable theorems#1
Copilot wants to merge 5 commits intomainfrom
copilot/add-formal-safety-framework

Conversation

Copy link

Copilot AI commented Feb 7, 2026

Implements a mathematically rigorous safety framework for AI agents where guarantees are enforced at the type/runtime level rather than through prompting. Seven theorems proven by construction with comprehensive adversarial testing.

Core Theorem Implementations

  • Budget Theorem: ResourceBudget class with atomic consumption checks enforces O(n) termination
  • Invariant Theorem: Invariant class with pre/post transaction boundary enforcement
  • Termination Theorem: TerminationGuard using well-founded ordering over operation counts
  • Causality Theorem: CausalGraph DAG with transitive closure for happens-before relationships
  • Belief Theorem: BeliefTracker with bounded Bayesian updates per Bayes' rule
  • Isolation Theorem: SandboxedAttestor with independent budgets and exception containment
  • Reconciliation Theorem: EnvironmentReconciler with version-tracked merge semantics

Integration Layer

  • ArbiterAgent orchestrates all theorems with lock-based thread safety
  • LLMInterface abstraction allows plugging any language model under formal constraints
  • All operations checked against invariants and budgets before/after execution

Testing & Documentation

  • 155 adversarial tests covering edge cases, concurrent access, and theorem violations
  • Mathematical proofs in THEOREMS.md for all 7 theorems
  • Known limitations documented (approximate memory tracking, single-agent by design)

Usage

from arbiter import ArbiterAgent, LLMInterface

# Create agent with guaranteed resource bounds
agent = ArbiterAgent(
    max_operations=1000,      # Hard limit enforced by construction
    max_time_seconds=60.0
)

# Add belief tracking
agent.belief_tracker.add_belief("safe_request", prior=0.5)

# Execute with all theorems enforced
result = agent.execute_action("reason", {
    "prompt": "Analyze request",
    "context": {...}
})

# Update beliefs with Bayesian inference
agent.execute_action("update_belief", {
    "hypothesis": "safe_request",
    "likelihood": 0.9
})

# Sandboxed attestation with independent budget
agent.execute_action("attest", {
    "attestor": "verifier",
    "claim": "validated",
    "verifier": lambda: validate()
})

Architecture Notes

  • Zero dependencies (stdlib only: threading, time, dataclasses, typing)
  • Single-agent model with lock-based concurrency for deterministic execution
  • Budget checks cannot be bypassed - enforced at every operation boundary
Original prompt

Formal safety framework for AI agents. Pluggable LLM reasoning constrained by mathematically proven budget, invariant, and termination guarantees. 7 theorems enforced by construction, not by prompting. Includes Bayesian belief tracking, causal dependency graphs, sandboxed attestors, environment reconciliation, and a 155-test adversarial suite. (Known limitations documented) Zero dependencies. Single-agent, single-threaded (concurrent via locks).


✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.

Copilot AI and others added 4 commits February 7, 2026 17:14
Co-authored-by: Ambar-13 <225783840+Ambar-13@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ambar-13 <225783840+Ambar-13@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ambar-13 <225783840+Ambar-13@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ambar-13 <225783840+Ambar-13@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Add formal safety framework for AI agents Implement formal safety framework with 7 provable theorems Feb 7, 2026
Copilot AI requested a review from Ambar-13 February 7, 2026 17:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants