[3130] Void declarations in the admin console#2251
Conversation
ad927e0 to
19d383b
Compare
|
Review app deployed to https://cpd-ec2-review-2251-web.test.teacherservices.cloud |
19d383b to
91ef3ec
Compare
91ef3ec to
00241f6
Compare
00241f6 to
f448c48
Compare
f448c48 to
ec30c67
Compare
ec30c67 to
3698036
Compare
3698036 to
14781c7
Compare
14781c7 to
10345ca
Compare
10345ca to
ab05ddd
Compare
avinhurry
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just a few tiny nits inline, but otherwise this is well organised and nicely done!
| <% end %> | ||
|
|
||
| <%= f.govuk_submit "Confirm void declaration", warning: true, class: "govuk-!-margin-top-6" %> | ||
| <% end %> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do we want a "Cancel and return..." link here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There is one in the ticket screenshot, but it's not there when I click through to the prototype, so looks like there was a decision to remove it.
| text = if declaration.voided_by_user.present? | ||
| "Voided by #{declaration.voided_by_user.name} (#{declaration.voided_by_user.email})" | ||
| else | ||
| "Voided by lead provider" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Since the row is "Clawed back", should the caption read "Clawed back by..." instead of "Voided by..."?
At the moment the wording is inconsistent, it reads a bit off to me. Did you have any thoughts on that?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah I had a similar thought 🤔 I can see the argument either way, but concluded that the verb/action/button the user took is to void the declaration, and clawback is something the system does in certain situations, but either way the declaration is still indeed voided. So since voided isn't wrong, IMO it's fine to defer to the design on this one.
5911222 to
6b27d01
Compare
6b27d01 to
4511520
Compare
…ack" to "awaiting_clawback" The actual clawback occurs when the clawback statement is paid At this point we've attached a clawback to a clawback statement, but it hasn't happened yet
|
|
Review app for PR 2251 was deleted |



Context
https://github.com/DFE-Digital/register-ects-project-board/issues/3130
Changes proposed in this pull request
Guidance to review