Conversation
|
Can't wait for this! Will it also have web support? |
|
Yes, it will support web, in fact this is the easiest part here 😄 |
|
Can’t wait for it to get released 🙏 |
|
This is great! 🚀 @tomekzaw are there any blockers for shipping this? |
|
If I were to guess, it would be Android and Web support, as the PR appears to only have @tomekzaw should I try to add web support here to help push things forward? |
|
@pzatorski Thanks! First we need to address some issues related to @nandorojo Implementing web version of |
|
Hi, any progress with this? |
|
Can't wait! |
|
When will be available? |
1 similar comment
|
When will be available? |
|
Any news ? |
|
what are you guys using for rendering ? |
|
Any news? |
|
what are you guys using for rendering ? |
|
Hi, any update on this? |
|
Hi, we'd like to first merge #520 and then use an analogous approach in this PR. |
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
|
Is it performant enough to just use it as a disabled input component? |
|
@markwitt1 Yes, but there are some layout-related differences between |
|
how about in a list? any perf considerations? |
|
@ericpoulinnz There are no updates on this PR. As for #520, I'm currently working on adapting it to RN 0.79.1+. When it comes to using a disabled |
|
Thanks for the quick response @tomekzaw . The performance was not too bad from my quick tests, but ran into the (obvious in hindsight) issue that links are not clickable in the TextInput mode (as far as I can see?) So I will use another solution for the meantime but eagerly await this PR being merged in :) |
|
@arpitv96171 Hi, we still haven't rolled out #520 to production so we need to focus on this first. Once it's working in the Expensify/App hopefully we should have some time to work on the |
|
Hi all, please check out |
Work in progress. Closes #93.