New variables to report land cover change transitions#385
Open
tgasser wants to merge 3 commits intoIAMconsortium:mainfrom
Open
New variables to report land cover change transitions#385tgasser wants to merge 3 commits intoIAMconsortium:mainfrom
tgasser wants to merge 3 commits intoIAMconsortium:mainfrom
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is the second of two PRs to initiate a change in the AFOLU-related reporting, following a community-wide consultation carried out within the NewPathways HEU project.
It introduces land cover change transition variables that teams could report and that would enable a much better reanalysis of land use change emissions and by bookkeeping models such as OSCAR (see Gidden et al.).
Note that this is a first attempt at something not too overwhelming. Level-1 transitions could be removed for simplicity. This could also be written differently (and more easily) with some additional parsing rules for tags (like exceptions).
In addition, the nested structure of IAMC variables is ill-suited for multi-dimensional variables such as these transitions, which is also visible in the case of crops in
land-coveras there's no clear priority in the variable tree between rainfed/irrigated and {crop-types} -- these require a horizontal structure instead of a vertical one.Suggest @flohump has a look.
Resulting definitions file attached: definitions_lcc_matrix.xlsx.
File structure changes:
land-cover-change-matrixunderafoluOther changes:
Land Cover|Other Naturalsubcategories to parallel that of forest with primary and secondary types and subtypesland-covervariables