Introduce AuthenticationHook#onAuthFromSession()#5467
Merged
Conversation
Especially useful for code not suitable for ApplicationStateHook due to the fact that a user can block requests to /application-state.
Member
Why? |
Member
|
This Copilot review is just spam. It would be great if you could hide the comment. |
Member
Author
Here, I've added yet another hook which is called on every single non-login request of authenticated users.
Just here or also in my other recent PRs?
Done. |
Member
But only for requests that require authentication, right? Anyway, the request hook serves a completely different purpose.
Just here, thx! |
lippserd
approved these changes
Jan 28, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Especially useful for code not suitable for ApplicationStateHook due to the fact that a user can block requests to /application-state.
This PR also questions the existence of #5433.