-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
Enhance type stability with extra type parameter #103
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
406d9ea
region type parameter
wheeheee e4d1d0d
more type stability
wheeheee 77e2ea3
complex arithmetic and formatting
wheeheee 7ba0adf
use randn with eltype arg
wheeheee 7d5810b
edit test_allocations
wheeheee f6e99e1
add FFTA dep to docs folder project.toml
wheeheee File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ | ||
| [deps] | ||
| Documenter = "e30172f5-a6a5-5a46-863b-614d45cd2de4" | ||
| FFTA = "b86e33f2-c0db-4aa1-a6e0-ab43e668529e" | ||
|
|
||
| [compat] | ||
| Documenter = "1" |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For my own reference, what's the effect of this change? I know basic macros, and I'm guessing that the point is to ensure the
@allocationssymbol doesn't appear in code run for Julia <1.9, but I was under the impression that the revised code amounts to the same thing.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@staticcauses the if statement to be evaluated only once during macro expansion, so after that the macro would be the code in only one of the branches. I suspected weird "action-at-a-distance" machinery was involved in allocating so I wanted to minimise extraneous code paths.That was also the motivation for escaping the
@allocationsmacro.How much this actually works, not clear, but it's not harmful or incorrect and the tests pass with this change.