Skip to content

docs: clarify memory bank status indicators#5667

Open
Olusammytee wants to merge 1 commit intoKilo-Org:mainfrom
Olusammytee:docs/memory-bank-status
Open

docs: clarify memory bank status indicators#5667
Olusammytee wants to merge 1 commit intoKilo-Org:mainfrom
Olusammytee:docs/memory-bank-status

Conversation

@Olusammytee
Copy link
Contributor

Summary\n- clarify that Memory Bank status indicators may not appear in all clients\n- soften guarantees to align with observed behavior\n\n## Testing\n- not run (docs-only)\n\nCloses #3837

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings February 5, 2026 00:54
@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Feb 5, 2026

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: aaddf08

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR addresses documentation confusion about Memory Bank status indicators by clarifying that they may not appear in all clients or modes, while the Memory Bank itself can still be active.

Changes:

  • Softened language from definitive statements to conditional statements about status indicator appearance
  • Added a new paragraph explicitly explaining that status indicators are not guaranteed and providing alternative verification methods

@kevinvandijk kevinvandijk added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Feb 5, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants