Draft
Conversation
883934b to
e0f52dc
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
I resolved the compile time issues with this PR now. There are still a few things that keep this a draft:
|
…e been coalesced instead of just one
…ally effected by the previous iteration
…xt iteration to speedup the pass
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Just a draft so people know this exists, its been quite a while since I have worked on this so I don't think its ready to merge.
It removes quite a few nodes and also improves runtime performance but significantly increases compile times.