Skip to content

Conversation

@CamosITSolutions
Copy link

@CamosITSolutions CamosITSolutions commented Oct 26, 2025

Description

Due to Bitnami changes in their repository, only the :latest tag is available within the bitnami public catalogue, with this project using on version tag 8.0.
Without this change, the following error occurs when running pnpm docker:db:up: "Error response from daemon: failed to resolve reference "docker.io/bitnami/valkey:8.0": docker.io/bitnami/valkey:8.0: not found"

Source: https://hub.docker.com/r/bitnami/valkey#%EF%B8%8F-important-notice-upcoming-changes-to-the-bitnami-catalog --"
Starting August 28th, over two weeks, all existing container images, including older or versioned tags (e.g., 2.50.0, 10.6), will be migrated from the public catalog (docker.io/bitnami) to the “Bitnami Legacy” repository (docker.io/bitnamilegacy), where they will no longer receive updates.
"


Type of Change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • 🐛 Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • 📝 Documentation update

Areas Affected

Please check all that apply:

  • Email Integration (Gmail, IMAP, etc.)
  • User Interface/Experience
  • Authentication/Authorization
  • Data Storage/Management
  • API Endpoints
  • Documentation
  • Testing Infrastructure
  • Development Workflow
  • Deployment/Infrastructure

Testing Done

Describe the tests you've done:
This was changed in my local system, and after running 'pnpm docker:db:up' the errors dissapeared. This is a simple fix where the repository previously referenced (bitnami) no longer contains tagged versions.

  • Unit tests added/updated
  • Integration tests added/updated
  • Manual testing performed
  • Cross-browser testing (if UI changes)
  • Mobile responsiveness verified (if UI changes)

Checklist

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document
  • My code follows the project's style guidelines
  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in complex areas
  • I have updated the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix/feature works
  • All tests pass locally
  • Any dependent changes are merged and published

Additional Notes

Add any other context about the pull request here.

Screenshots/Recordings

Add screenshots or recordings here if applicable.


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the project's license.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Switched the database service to a legacy container image for both local and production deployments.
    • Adjusted the persistent data mount layout to match the legacy image’s expected directory structure, ensuring existing data paths remain compatible.

Due to Bitnami Valkey packages becoming hardened, only the :latest tag is available within the bitnami public catalogue. Without this change, the following error occurs: 
"Error response from daemon: failed to resolve reference "docker.io/bitnami/valkey:8.0": docker.io/bitnami/valkey:8.0: not found"

Source: https://hub.docker.com/r/bitnami/valkey#%EF%B8%8F-important-notice-upcoming-changes-to-the-bitnami-catalog
------------------
Starting August 28th, over two weeks, all existing container images, including older or versioned tags (e.g., 2.50.0, 10.6), will be migrated from the public catalog (docker.io/bitnami) to the “Bitnami Legacy” repository (docker.io/bitnamilegacy), where they will no longer receive updates.
-----------------
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 26, 2025

Walkthrough

Replaced the Valkey container image reference in two docker-compose files and updated the mounted Valkey data volume path in both files. No runtime control flow or exported/public API declarations were modified.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Database / Local compose
docker-compose.db.yaml
Updated valkey service image from docker.io/bitnami/valkey:8.0 to docker.io/bitnamilegacy/valkey:8.0; changed mounted data volume path from /bitnami/valkey/data to /bitnamilegacy/valkey/data.
Production compose
docker-compose.prod.yaml
Updated valkey service image from docker.io/bitnami/valkey:8.0 to docker.io/bitnamilegacy/valkey:8.0; changed mounted data volume path from /bitnami/valkey/data to /bitnamilegacy/valkey/data.

Sequence Diagram(s)

(omitted — configuration-only changes; no control-flow modifications)

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

  • Areas to check during review:
    • Confirm docker.io/bitnamilegacy/valkey:8.0 exists, is trusted, and matches expected image contents.
    • Validate the new volume path /bitnamilegacy/valkey/data is correct for both local and production deployments and aligns with backups and deployment scripts.
    • Search documentation, CI/CD configs, and operational runbooks for references to the old image name or path and update if present.

Poem

🐰 I nibbled through YAML, swift and spry,
Swapped an image tag and gave the mount a try.
Two composes hum where legacy data sleeps,
A twitch, a thump — I guard the rabbit keeps,
Hop, deploy, and off to carrot dreams. 🥕

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The PR title "Change bitnami/valkey to bitnamilegacy/valkey" directly and accurately describes the main change across the pull request. Both modified files (docker-compose.db.yaml and docker-compose.prod.yaml) have the exact same core modification: updating the Valkey Docker image registry from docker.io/bitnami to docker.io/bitnamilegacy, along with corresponding path updates. The title is concise, specific, and clearly communicates the essential change without vague terminology or noise. It would allow a developer scanning the commit history to immediately understand the purpose of this changeset.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 64c5480 and 8cc113b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docker-compose.db.yaml (1 hunks)

Updated docker-compose.prod.yaml to bitnamilegacy
@CamosITSolutions
Copy link
Author

Updated docker-compose.prod.yaml

@CamosITSolutions
Copy link
Author

@coderabbitai help

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 27, 2025

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

CodeRabbit commands

These commands are invoked using PR/Issue comments.

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai evaluate custom pre-merge check --instructions <custom-checks-instructions> --name <custom-checks-title> [--mode <error|warning>] to validate the custom pre-merge checks instructions. Defaults to error when --mode is omitted.
    • @coderabbitai ignore pre-merge checks to override pre-merge checks and get an approval on PR.
    • @coderabbitai run pre-merge checks to run pre-merge checks on the pull request.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve to resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore or @coderabbit ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit configuration file (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Status, support, documentation and community

  • Visit our status page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.
  • Visit our documentation site for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord community to connect with other users and get help from the community.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@CamosITSolutions
Copy link
Author

@coderabbitai full review

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 27, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Full review triggered.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8cc113b and 10d89bf.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docker-compose.prod.yaml (1 hunks)

Comment on lines +71 to +76
image: docker.io/bitnamilegacy/valkey:8.0
environment:
- ALLOW_EMPTY_PASSWORD=yes
- VALKEY_DISABLE_COMMANDS=FLUSHDB,FLUSHALL
volumes:
- valkey-data:/bitnami/valkey/data
- valkey-data:/bitnamilegacy/valkey/data
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

🧩 Analysis chain

Verify volume path change doesn't cause data loss and that the image exists at the new registry.

The image reference and volume mount path have been updated to reflect Bitnami's migration to the legacy repository. However, the volume path change from /bitnami/valkey/data to /bitnamilegacy/valkey/data could affect data persistence if this is an existing deployment.

Additionally, confirm that the image tag :8.0 exists in the docker.io/bitnamilegacy registry, since this is a breaking change.

Run the following verification to check image availability and consistency across compose files:


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the Valkey image exists at the new registry and check consistency with other compose files.

# Check if the new image reference exists in the registry
echo "Checking if docker.io/bitnamilegacy/valkey:8.0 is accessible..."
docker manifest inspect docker.io/bitnamilegacy/valkey:8.0 2>&1 | head -20

echo ""
echo "Searching for all Valkey references in docker-compose files..."
# Search for Valkey service definitions in all compose files
fd -e yaml -e yml . -x grep -l "valkey:" {} \;

echo ""
echo "Verifying consistency of Valkey image and volume paths across all compose files..."
# Find all lines with valkey image or volume references
rg -n "bitnamilegacy/valkey|valkey-data:" --type yaml

Length of output: 680


Critical: Volume mount path inconsistency across compose files—data persistence at risk.

While the image update to docker.io/bitnamilegacy/valkey:8.0 is consistent across files, the volume mount paths have diverged:

  • docker-compose.prod.yaml line 76: valkey-data:/bitnamilegacy/valkey/data
  • docker-compose.db.yaml line 25: valkey-data:/bitnami/valkey/data

Both reference the same volume name (valkey-data) but mount to different paths inside their containers. This inconsistency must be resolved: either both should use /bitnamilegacy/valkey/data to match the image migration, or the migration in docker-compose.prod.yaml was incomplete and docker-compose.db.yaml also needs updating.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In docker-compose.prod.yaml around lines 71-76 the volume mount uses
valkey-data:/bitnamilegacy/valkey/data which conflicts with
docker-compose.db.yaml (line 25) that mounts valkey-data:/bitnami/valkey/data;
pick the correct in-container path (prefer /bitnamilegacy/valkey/data to match
the updated image) and update the other compose file so both use the identical
mount path for valkey-data, then verify the volumes section references the same
volume name and redeploy/restart services to ensure persisted data lands in the
expected location.

Updated bitnami to bitnamilegacy
@CamosITSolutions
Copy link
Author

@coderabbitai full review

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 27, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Full review triggered.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
docker-compose.db.yaml (1)

18-18: ✅ Image and volume mount updates correctly aligned with Bitnami migration.

Both the image reference (docker.io/bitnamilegacy/valkey:8.0) and volume mount path (/bitnamilegacy/valkey/data) are now consistent with the Bitnami repository migration and match docker-compose.prod.yaml. The past review's flag about inconsistency between compose files has been resolved.

Optional: Provide migration guidance for existing deployments. If this compose file is used for local development and any developers have persisted Valkey data from prior deployments using the old image path (/bitnami/valkey/data), consider documenting the volume path change or providing a migration step to avoid confusion when upgrading to this version.

Also applies to: 25-25

docker-compose.prod.yaml (1)

71-71: ✅ Production image and volume updates aligned with staging environment.

The image reference and volume mount path are now consistent with docker-compose.db.yaml, resolving the earlier inconsistency flagged in past reviews. The docker.io/bitnamilegacy/valkey:8.0 image is the correct target post-migration (Sept 29, 2025 deadline).

Optional: Document data migration path for existing production deployments. If this is a production environment upgrade with existing persisted Valkey data, ensure deployment documentation clarifies how data in the old volume path will be handled, or provide backup/restore procedures to prevent data loss during the rollout.

Also applies to: 76-76

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 64c5480 and b9537ce.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • docker-compose.db.yaml (1 hunks)
  • docker-compose.prod.yaml (1 hunks)

@CamosITSolutions
Copy link
Author

@coderabbitai run pre-merge checks

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 27, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Running Pre-merge checks. Results will be posted in the summary comment once complete.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant