route code refactor #1
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Improvements Made:
Input Destructuring: Combined the await req.json() with destructuring for clarity and conciseness.
Removed Unused Console Logs: Removed the commented-out console logs to keep the code clean.
Error Logging: Enhanced the error logging to provide context, making it easier to debug issues.
Promise Handling: Simplified the Promise.all handling for updating user chats. This maintains readability while ensuring that all updates are executed concurrently.
Response Headers: Added content type to the error response for consistency.
Consistent Structure: Ensured that the flow of the code is clear and consistent, making it easier to follow.
Removed Redundant Code: The commented-out code for handling existing chats was removed for clarity. If you need that logic, consider re-implementing it cleanly.