Skip to content

Conversation

@LOCEANlloydizard
Copy link
Collaborator

@LOCEANlloydizard LOCEANlloydizard commented Jan 8, 2026

This PR address deprecated inputs and aligning Codecov usage with v5.

  • Update Codecov inputs (file -> files) and other deprecated workflow parameters
  • Fix invalid GitHub Actions if-expression syntax
  • Enable fail_ci_if_error to surface issues (or do we want to keep it off? @leewujung)
  • Remove disabled Windows workflows now covered by pr.yaml

- change 'file' to 'files'
- set Codecov fail_ci_if_error=true to surface potential other errors
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 8, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 84.95%. Comparing base (d371686) to head (f9fedc8).
⚠️ Report is 29 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1595   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   84.95%   84.95%           
=======================================
  Files          79       79           
  Lines        6998     6998           
=======================================
  Hits         5945     5945           
  Misses       1053     1053           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 84.95% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

- Replace deprecated inputs (e.g. file -> files, repository_url -> repository-url)
- Fix invalid GitHub Actions if-expression syntax
- Enable fail_ci_if_error to surface CI issues
- Delete windows disabled workflow files
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants