Open
Conversation
Collaborator
|
It would be good to know if this is faster. Maybe you could try just creating a wrapper class for packbits https://numpy.org/doc/2.3/reference/generated/numpy.packbits.html |
Author
|
I will provide a basic comparison with lists and a compact bool list, then look into the numpy packbits wrapper. Also could you elaborate on displaying data in binary, as in? I got a bit confused. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@y-richie-y
Possible solution to the bool list.
Handles most of the list functions like native methods (getter index and slice based, setter index based, append, _iter_, _repr_ and _next_ )
Easy conversion to native Python list also.
Uses bytes class as mentioned.