Merged
Conversation
ddbaptiste
requested changes
Mar 10, 2025
Member
ddbaptiste
left a comment
ddbaptiste
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Requesting one change, for which I've added a suggestion. Additionally, I'm hoping that this PR can be merged after #77, which I just submitted, which should hopefully clean up what's going on with the headers currently.
Co-authored-by: Dimitri Baptiste <55843498+ddbaptiste@users.noreply.github.com>
MJC598
force-pushed
the
detect-linking-hotfix
branch
from
ab5921f to
22062e8
Compare
ddbaptiste
requested changes
Mar 10, 2025
Member
ddbaptiste
left a comment
ddbaptiste
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Requesting the headers get fixed such that Project is the Git root folder rather than the folder containing the file.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It was just a dumb thing on the query requiring a pregnancy column. Basically made the SQL query conditional on if the pregnancy event exists.