Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 10: Client-side cross-site scripting#13
Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 10: Client-side cross-site scripting#13EthanThePhoenix38 merged 2 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
…scripting Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This pull request addresses a client-side cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability (GitHub Security Alert #10) by implementing URL validation and normalization before using URL parameters in navigation sinks. The fix ensures that user-controlled URL parameters are properly sanitized using the URL constructor after validation, and only the normalized value is used for DOM assignments and navigation.
Key changes:
- Introduces
safeArticleUrlvariable that holds the normalized URL output fromnew URL(articleUrl).toString() - Replaces direct usage of
articleUrlwithsafeArticleUrlin all navigation sinks (iframe src and anchor hrefs)
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // If article parameters exist and URL is valid, show article view |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This comment is redundant with the code logic itself. The condition if (articleUrl && isValidHttpUrl(articleUrl)) is self-documenting, and adding this comment doesn't provide additional value. Consider removing this comment to reduce noise.
| // If article parameters exist and URL is valid, show article view |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: abf8b1a473
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| // If article parameters exist and URL is valid, show article view | ||
| if (articleUrl && isValidHttpUrl(articleUrl)) { | ||
| const safeArticleUrl = new URL(articleUrl).toString(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Close the new validity guard to avoid script parse error
The newly added if (articleUrl && isValidHttpUrl(articleUrl)) { is never closed, so the browser hits an unmatched { and throws a syntax error when parsing the script. That stops all subsequent JS from running (view switching, tab handlers, tracking), even for valid URLs. This is introduced by the commit and will break the reader page for every load until the missing } is added.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Potential fix for https://github.com/ThePhoenixAgency/AI-Pulse/security/code-scanning/10
General fix: Never use unvalidated, user-controlled URL parameters directly in navigation sinks or DOM assignments. Instead, validate and normalize the URL once (e.g., via the
URLconstructor plus a strict scheme whitelist), store it in a separate variable, and only ever use that validated value (safeUrl) at sinks such asiframe.srcanda.href.Best concrete fix here: Inside the existing
if (articleUrl && isValidHttpUrl(articleUrl)) { ... }block, create a newURLobject fromarticleUrland store its string representation in a new constant, for exampleconst safeArticleUrl = new URL(articleUrl).toString();. Then usesafeArticleUrlfor all navigation-related assignments:openExternal.href,openExternalError.href, andiframe.src. This makes the data-flow explicit: the sink only sees a value that has passedisValidHttpUrlandURLparsing, which both tightens security and clarifies to CodeQL that the sink value is derived from a validated URL. No change in user-visible functionality occurs, because for valid HTTP(S) URLs thetoString()result is equivalent to what was being used before (just normalized). All changes are limited to the provided script area inreader.html; no new imports or external libraries are required.Specific changes (line references approximate based on snippet):
reader.html, inside theif (articleUrl && isValidHttpUrl(articleUrl)) { ... }block around lines 460–497:ifline, addconst safeArticleUrl = new URL(articleUrl).toString();.document.getElementById('openExternal').href = articleUrl;document.getElementById('openExternalError').href = articleUrl;iframe.src = articleUrl;with the same assignments but using
safeArticleUrlinstead.This preserves existing behavior while ensuring the value used at navigation sinks is clearly validated and normalized.
Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.