- Ensure that the name matches the Java macro name here:
- public class MACRO_NAME_HERE extends StarMacro {
- Edit: The Vapor Chamber and the Fluid Volume must be set to steady state and run together if using a porous medium for your heat sink or you will get the error: No patches found (I have not found a way to resolve this issue).
- ElectronicsCHTAlternatingMacro.java is a simplified working version where the Vapor Chamber and Fluid Volume are run steady-state while the PCB and Die are run Unsteady (tested and working)
GPU thermal transients present a computational challenge due to vastly different timescales:
- Airflow: steady
- GPU die: Fast thermal response (10-100 ms)
- Heat sink mass: Slow response (1-10 seconds)
Traditional fully-coupled transient CHT requires timesteps of microsecond to maintain stability, making 10-second transients computationally prohibitive.
This macro implements an alternating fluid-solid solution approach:
- Fluid phase: Converge steady-state airflow with frozen solid temperatures
- Solid phase: Advance transient heat conduction with updated convective BCs
- Repeat: Alternate until transient completes
- Maintains accuracy for thermal events with timescale >> fluid response
- Production-ready for GPU design optimization
- Power-on thermal transients
- Thermal throttling behavior prediction
- Gaming load profile simulation
- Data center cold-start analysis
- Cooling system design optimization
Timestep selection:
- Solid timestep: 10 ms (captures die thermal time constant ~50-100 ms)
- Fluid iterations: 30 per cycle (converges flow field)
- Subcycles: 2 per major timestep (fluid-solid alternations)
GPU stack components:
- Silicon die (high power density)
- Silicon substrate (high conductivity)
- Vapor chamber (two-phase spreading)
- Thermal interface material (critical resistance)
- Cold plate (aluminum/copper)
- PCB (FR4, low conductivity)
// In STAR-CCM+ macro environment:
// 1. Set up GPU geometry with appropriate continua names
// 2. Define boundary conditions (power, inlet conditions)
// 3. Run this macro to execute partitioned transient solutionAuthor: Mitchell Stolk
Application: GPU/Electronics Thermal Management
Date: November 2025
This partitioned CHT approach is designed for fast turnaround during design exploration and early-stage optimization.
Because the fluid and solid domains are advanced separately rather than fully coupled each timestep, this method inherently sacrifices some numerical accuracy and introduces Numerical Errors.
For high-fidelity validation, fast fluid–thermal interactions, or safety-critical work, a fully-coupled transient CHT simulation should be used instead.