Skip to content

Conversation

@andreasnoack
Copy link
Owner

Instead, define an unexported roots function. Also, some adjustments of CI.

Closes #23

Instead, define an unexported roots function. Also, some adjustments
of CI.
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.30%. Comparing base (f73575a) to head (1128fd3).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #29   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.30%   92.30%           
=======================================
  Files           1        1           
  Lines          26       26           
=======================================
  Hits           24       24           
  Misses          2        2           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@andreasnoack andreasnoack merged commit d16ceb1 into master Jul 19, 2025
4 checks passed
@andreasnoack andreasnoack deleted the an/nopiracy branch July 19, 2025 21:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

awkward that you overwrite existing Polynomials.roots(); prevents comparison

2 participants