Created GetIptablesMode to log legacy or nftables backend#3565
Open
cdirubbio wants to merge 1 commit intoaws:masterfrom
Open
Created GetIptablesMode to log legacy or nftables backend#3565cdirubbio wants to merge 1 commit intoaws:masterfrom
cdirubbio wants to merge 1 commit intoaws:masterfrom
Conversation
…usr/sbin/iptables-wrapper
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What type of PR is this? improvement
Which issue does this PR fix?:
What does this PR do / Why do we need it?:
/usr/sbin/iptables-wrapperpicks the iptables backend used based on a few conditions. With this change, a method is introduced to get the iptables mode (either nf_tables or legacy) in-use.The package
go-iptablesthat the vpc cni uses to interact with iptables is no longer being maintained, so this is the current solution. Following this change, we get the following log line during startup, prior to creation and insertion of iptables rules.Testing done on this change:
Will this PR introduce any new dependencies?:
Will this break upgrades or downgrades? Has updating a running cluster been tested?:
Does this change require updates to the CNI daemonset config files to work?:
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?:
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.