Skip to content

Add Gemini 3.1 Pro to Antigravity provider#1683

Closed
Whamp wants to merge 1 commit intobadlogic:mainfrom
Whamp:add-gemini-3.1-antigravity
Closed

Add Gemini 3.1 Pro to Antigravity provider#1683
Whamp wants to merge 1 commit intobadlogic:mainfrom
Whamp:add-gemini-3.1-antigravity

Conversation

@Whamp
Copy link
Contributor

@Whamp Whamp commented Feb 27, 2026

Hey, I have a fork where I've added Gemini 3.1 Pro support to the Antigravity provider. Two model entries (gemini-3.1-pro-high and gemini-3.1-pro-low) following the same thinking-level split as the existing 3-pro models.

Also bumps the Antigravity version to 1.18.0 and updates the thinking-level routing to handle the 3.1-pro model ID.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @Whamp, thanks for your interest in contributing!

We ask new contributors to open an issue first before submitting a PR. This helps us discuss the approach and avoid wasted effort.

Next steps:

  1. Open an issue describing what you want to change and why (keep it concise, write in your human voice, AI slop will be closed)
  2. Once a maintainer approves with lgtm, you'll be added to the approved contributors list
  3. Then you can submit your PR

This PR will be closed automatically. See https://github.com/badlogic/pi-mono/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md for more details.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Feb 27, 2026
@Whamp
Copy link
Contributor Author

Whamp commented Feb 27, 2026

Sorry i got fooled by the new version released notification in my pi. I thought vacation was over. Nothing to see here !

yorha59 added a commit to yorha59/pi-mono that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2026
Gemini 3.1 Pro models need to go through the same thinking level
routing as 3-pro models (LOW/HIGH instead of MINIMAL/LOW/MEDIUM/HIGH).

Without this fix, 3.1-pro falls through to the generic budget-based
thinking path instead of using Google's native thinking levels.

Credit: PR badlogic#1683 by @Whamp
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant