Skip to content

Comments

Update OIDS of NIST approved post quantum algorithms#592

Merged
TharmiganK merged 3 commits intomasterfrom
revert-590-revert-588-bc-update
Mar 11, 2025
Merged

Update OIDS of NIST approved post quantum algorithms#592
TharmiganK merged 3 commits intomasterfrom
revert-590-revert-588-bc-update

Conversation

@TharmiganK
Copy link
Contributor

Purpose

Related issue ballerina-platform/ballerina-library#7678

Examples

Checklist

  • Linked to an issue
  • Updated the changelog
  • Added tests
  • Updated the spec
  • Checked native-image compatibility

@TharmiganK TharmiganK changed the title Update OIDS of NIST approved post quantum algorithms"" Update OIDS of NIST approved post quantum algorithms Mar 10, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 10, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.47%. Comparing base (e7229f2) to head (50db727).
Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #592      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     83.44%   83.47%   +0.02%     
+ Complexity      228      226       -2     
============================================
  Files            30       30              
  Lines          1287     1283       -4     
  Branches        180      180              
============================================
- Hits           1074     1071       -3     
+ Misses          170      169       -1     
  Partials         43       43              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@TharmiganK TharmiganK merged commit 05d539b into master Mar 11, 2025
8 checks passed
@TharmiganK TharmiganK deleted the revert-590-revert-588-bc-update branch March 11, 2025 07:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants