Open
Conversation
Member
|
Closing in favor of #231. |
Member
|
@luisschwab #231 cannot directly replace this PR. Relying on changesets mean that order of updates matter, and for @icota's usecase, it seems they rather not depend on that! This PR is conceptACK for me, but implementation NACK. The problem is with the serialization of |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
The rationale behind this is to allow a separate instance of the same wallet be updated on a device that's not necessarily connected. Like a hardware wallet.
A connected device gets the response, serializes it with serde and passes the
Updateto the air-gapped one.Depends on bitcoindevkit/bdk#1954
Checklists
All Submissions:
cargo fmtandcargo clippybefore committing