Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @rthellend, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces a Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a Ready() method to jwks.Remote to signal when initial JWKS fetches are complete. While this is a useful feature, the current implementation of Ready() has a critical flaw that can lead to a deadlock, and it doesn't correctly handle context cancellation. Additionally, the tests for this new functionality are not comprehensive enough to cover important edge cases. I've provided detailed comments on these issues.
|
/gemini review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a Ready() method to jwks.Remote to allow waiting for the initial fetch of all issuer keys. This is a useful addition that simplifies client code, as demonstrated by the test case simplification.
However, there is a critical race condition in the implementation that can lead to a panic due to a channel being closed twice. When an issuer is removed via SetIssuers at the same time its keys are being fetched by fetchJWKS, both methods might attempt to close the same ready channel.
I've provided suggestions to fix this using sync.Once to ensure the channel is closed safely and only once. This requires a small addition to the trustedIssuer struct.
Description
Add Ready() to jwks.Remote. This function returns when all issuer keys have been fetched at least once.
Type of change
How is this change tested ?