restructure code

[RiRa12621]

No description provided.

[NautiluX]

does it really need a separate binary? Could also be just a subcommand?

[RiRa12621]

I did like the idea of having them separate. Since they're in the same repo, they can easily share functions etc.
If the functionally for either gets extended, doesn't make the other more fat

[RiRa12621]

I guess we would probably also not need cobra or anything for the service? i guess it would just have a single command and flags or a config file, no sub-commnds or anything?
So while they will perform some similar actions, they will probably differ in how they're set up @NautiluX

[RiRa12621]

svc build failing is expected, because there's nothin the service folder yet to be build, including the folder that doens't exist.

[NautiluX]

should we disable the action then until it's expected to work or add the necessary boilerplate to make it work?