Skip to content

2026 First Contest Bronze: Cow Splits Solution#5938

Open
AsynchronousAI wants to merge 12 commits intocpinitiative:masterfrom
AsynchronousAI:2026-cow-splits
Open

2026 First Contest Bronze: Cow Splits Solution#5938
AsynchronousAI wants to merge 12 commits intocpinitiative:masterfrom
AsynchronousAI:2026-cow-splits

Conversation

@AsynchronousAI
Copy link
Contributor

Place an "x" in the corresponding checkbox if it is done or does not apply to this pull request.

  • I have tested my code.
  • I have added my solution according to the steps here.
  • I have followed the code conventions mentioned here.
    • I understand that if it is clear that I have not attempted to follow these conventions, my PR will be closed.
    • If changes are requested, I will re-request a review after addressing them.
  • I have linked this PR to any issues that it closes.

@AsynchronousAI
Copy link
Contributor Author

Screenshot 2026-02-07 at 11 05 37 AM I added visual aid using tables also, should help visualize how the algorithm works.

@AsynchronousAI
Copy link
Contributor Author

I just found an issue with my patch adding 2026 problem support, that being that clicking Internal Sol from USACO Monthlies does not work 😣. Will fix soon.

Copy link
Contributor

@eysbutno eysbutno left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

good work! just some nitpicking

Co-authored-by: Justin Ji <68484800+eysbutno@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@eysbutno eysbutno left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

more nitpicks

good work!

guodavid0418 and others added 2 commits February 7, 2026 17:36
Co-authored-by: Justin Ji <68484800+eysbutno@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Justin Ji <68484800+eysbutno@users.noreply.github.com>
@guodavid0418 guodavid0418 removed the request for review from envyaims February 8, 2026 01:36
guodavid0418 and others added 2 commits February 7, 2026 17:36
Co-authored-by: Justin Ji <68484800+eysbutno@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@lems9520138 lems9520138 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Amazing work :D

@lems9520138
Copy link
Contributor

lems9520138 commented Feb 10, 2026

This is my personal opinion (feel free to reject) but I would make Observations 1 through 3 as hints because the fourth one is just the solution, but the first three are hints for subtasks/potential for full sol.

And maybe rename Observation 4 to Full Solution or something? (Idk)

AsynchronousAI and others added 2 commits February 10, 2026 17:01
Co-authored-by: lems9520138 <arnavg9771@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: lems9520138 <arnavg9771@gmail.com>
@AsynchronousAI
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is my personal opinion (feel free to reject) but I would make Observations 1 through 3 as hints because the fourth one is just the solution, but the first three are hints for subtasks/potential for full sol.

And maybe rename Observation 4 to Full Solution or something? (Idk)

I think Observations 1 to 3 should not be hints since they are more like subtasks, I did rename Observation 4 to Full Solution since that makes sense.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants