Skip to content

Conversation

@davidjgoss
Copy link
Contributor

@davidjgoss davidjgoss commented Feb 6, 2026

🤔 What's changed?

  • Mark undefined and ambiguous steps following a failed-ish step in the reference implementation, and add a new sample to cover this. Some implementations may not adopt this behaviour.
  • Add a scenario to the "skipped" sample to cover existing behaviour around failed After hooks following a skipped step.

⚡️ What's your motivation?

Fixes #237.

🏷️ What kind of change is this?

  • ⚡ New feature (non-breaking change which adds new behaviour)
  • 💥 Breaking change (incompatible changes to the API)

📋 Checklist:

  • I agree to respect and uphold the Cucumber Community Code of Conduct
  • I've changed the behaviour of the code
    • I have added/updated tests to cover my changes.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
    • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • Users should know about my change
    • I have added an entry to the "Unreleased" section of the CHANGELOG, linking to this pull request.

This text was originally generated from a template, then edited by hand. You can modify the template here.

@davidjgoss davidjgoss marked this pull request as ready for review February 6, 2026 09:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Undefined or ambiguous steps following a non-passing step

1 participant