-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Better test coverage #5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughAdds a comprehensive suite of tests to Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)No sequence diagram — changes are test additions only and do not alter runtime control flow. Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used🧬 Code graph analysis (1)src/index.spec.ts (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #5 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 90.00% 100.00% +10.00%
============================================
Files 1 1
Lines 20 20
Branches 3 3
============================================
+ Hits 18 20 +2
+ Misses 2 0 -2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/index.spec.ts (1)
209-246: Clarify the error source in the test comment.The test comment on line 213 states "Using an invalid cwd path should cause an error in core", but the actual error is likely triggered by the nonexistent template file (
nonexistent.html.twig) rather than the invalid cwd path alone. The test will still function correctly, but the comment could mislead future maintainers about what's actually being tested.Consider updating the comment to:
- // Create a config that will cause core() to fail - // Using an invalid cwd path should cause an error in core + // Create a config that will cause core() to fail + // Using nonexistent template paths should cause an error in core
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/index.spec.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
src/index.spec.ts (1)
src/index.ts (3)
gulpTateruCli(63-108)Formatter(12-15)Minify(23-23)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (8)
src/index.spec.ts (8)
193-207: LGTM! Null file passthrough verified correctly.This test correctly verifies that null Vinyl files pass through unchanged, which aligns with the implementation in
src/index.ts(lines 67-69).
248-266: LGTM! Env option test is clean and focused.This test appropriately validates the
envoption in isolation, following the established test pattern.
268-298: LGTM! Combined formatter and minify test is well-structured.This test correctly validates that both formatter and minify functions can work together, with appropriate assertions for each transformation.
300-324: LGTM! File type handling test provides good coverage.This test effectively validates that different file types (html, txt, xml, webmanifest) are correctly passed to the formatter function.
326-349: LGTM! Vinyl file properties are properly validated.This test provides good sanity checks for generated Vinyl files, ensuring they have the expected structure and properties.
351-370: LGTM! Nonexistent page handling is verified.This test correctly validates graceful handling of nonexistent pages, expecting zero files without errors.
372-391: LGTM! Nonexistent language handling is verified.This test appropriately validates graceful handling of nonexistent languages, mirroring the nonexistent page test pattern.
393-431: LGTM! Async formatter and minify functions are properly tested.This test effectively validates that asynchronous formatter and minify functions work correctly, with appropriate async simulation and verification of both transformations.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/index.spec.ts (1)
209-246: Consider clarifying the error trigger source.The test correctly validates that errors from the core function are wrapped in
PluginErrorwith the proper plugin name. However, the comment at line 213 suggests the invalidcwdpath causes the error, but the nonexistent template file ('nonexistent.html.twig') might be the actual trigger. Consider updating the comment to reflect that any invalid configuration will cause an error, or verify which specific element triggers the failure.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/index.spec.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
src/index.spec.ts (1)
src/index.ts (3)
gulpTateruCli(63-108)Formatter(12-15)Minify(23-23)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (8)
src/index.spec.ts (8)
193-207: LGTM! Null file passthrough test is well-structured.The test correctly verifies that null files pass through unchanged, aligning with the production code behavior at lines 65-67 in
src/index.ts.
248-266: LGTM! Good isolation of the env option.This test appropriately validates the
envoption in isolation, complementing the existing multi-option test and improving overall coverage.
268-298: LGTM! Excellent integration test for formatter and minify.The test correctly validates that both formatter and minify functions work together, with appropriate assertions checking both the formatter prefix and the minification effect on whitespace.
300-324: LGTM! Comprehensive file type coverage validation.The test effectively validates that the formatter is invoked for multiple file types, with good defensive coding in the test double at line 303 handling the optional
fileTypeparameter.
326-349: LGTM! Proper validation of Vinyl file properties.The test correctly verifies that generated files are properly structured Vinyl instances with appropriate properties, aligning with the production code's Vinyl file creation logic.
351-370: LGTM! Good edge case coverage for nonexistent pages.The test appropriately validates that requesting a nonexistent page generates zero files without throwing errors, demonstrating graceful handling of invalid page references.
372-391: LGTM! Good edge case coverage for nonexistent languages.The test appropriately validates that requesting a nonexistent language generates zero files without errors, complementing the nonexistent page test and ensuring robust edge case handling.
393-431: LGTM! Validates async formatter and minify handling.The test correctly validates that asynchronous formatter and minify functions work properly. The use of
setTimeouteffectively simulates real async operations, and both transformations are appropriately verified.Note: The 1ms timeout is sufficiently short that flakiness is unlikely, but if test instability occurs in CI environments under heavy load, consider increasing the delay slightly.
This pull request significantly expands the test coverage for the
gulpTateruCliplugin insrc/index.spec.ts. The new tests cover various edge cases, error handling, and integration scenarios to ensure the plugin behaves correctly under different conditions and with different configuration options.Expanded test coverage and validation:
PluginErrorinstances.envoption independently, and for simultaneous use of customformatterandminifyfunctions, ensuring they work together as expected.Robustness and edge-case handling:
formatterandminifyfunctions to ensure the plugin supports async processing.Summary by CodeRabbit