Optimize Scikit-learn model loading by adding Bulk Tree Construction API

[dantegd]

This PR introduces a bulk tree construction API that significantly improves performance when importing scikit-learn RandomForest models into Treelite. In my benchmarks, the new API achieves ~7-10x speedup over the existing node-by-node construction approach of the current sklearn loader.

The current implementation spends significant time in per-node overhead due to:

• Repeated ModelBuilder method calls for each node
• Python-C++ boundary crossing overhead accumulating across millions of nodes
• Memory allocation patterns that don't benefit from bulk operations

This becomes a bottleneck in workflows like cuML's RandomForestClassifier.from_sklearn(), where treelite import time dominates the conversion process.

This PR implements a BulkConstructTree friend function that directly populates the Tree class's internal ContiguousArray members in a single pass, bypassing the ModelBuilder abstraction for sklearn imports.

Initial benchmarks:

Configuration	Total Nodes	Old API (ms)	Bulk API (ms)	Speedup
classifier, 50 trees, depth=10	39,844	13.5	1.8	7.45x
classifier, 100 trees, depth=15	351,826	77.3	10.2	7.54x
classifier, 300 trees, depth=20	2,520,062	544.9	60.7	8.98x
regressor, 100 trees, depth=15	978,436	195.6	18.8	10.42x

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 99.29329% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 83.73%. Comparing base (a9ce6c3) to head (0c46c84).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
python/treelite/sklearn/importer.py	71.42%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           mainline     #651      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     84.35%   83.73%   -0.63%     
============================================
  Files            75       76       +1     
  Lines          6653     6927     +274     
  Branches        543      561      +18     
============================================
+ Hits           5612     5800     +188     
- Misses         1041     1127      +86     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[hcho3]

Can we go ahead and simply remove the old sklearn model builder functions? So LoadSKLearnRandomForestRegressorBulk should be simply called LoadSKLearnRandomForestRegressor, etc.

I don't see a good reason to keep the old functions around, if the new functions are equivalent in functionalities but faster.