Conversation
|
@guardrex, tell me if I'm reading something wrong but before I read the changes I was assuming this PR is updating the docs for net11, so that we inform about the unification of format. I cannot find any monkier that is for net11, everything is |
|
The code that will be shown for 11.0 is actually marked >=8.0 because this format for start options was always in place for BWAs. The pattern is this ... ... and some cases are a little different from there because in some cases the preceding pattern has to be modified for when a feature arrived after a non-8.0 version. |
ilonatommy
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
All examples are valid in the given version spaces. The matrix I was using to validate it, for reference:
| App Type | Direct Options, <net11 | Direct Options, >=net11 | Nested Options, <net11 | Nested Options, >=net11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blazor Server | V | V | X | V |
| Standalone Blazor WebAssembly | V | V | X | V |
| Blazor Web App (blazor.web.js) |
V | V | V | V |
|
Thanks @ilonatommy! I'm on stand-by now for when Preview 1 lands (and we still need the 11.0 version moniker to merge all of these 11.0 P1 PRs). |
Fixes #34659
Note: What's New coverage for this is already on #36449.
Ilona ... This is painful on the 👁️ to look at 😄. The versioning is more complex than usual because we had the two hosting models using different approaches for a while, and I want to keep the content duplication to a minimum. I think you only need to concentrate on the code examples to confirm correct formats. I'll inspect these articles on the live site after Preview 1 releases to confirm that the articles are rendering correctly.
WRT the build failures, I think they're all related to not having the 11.0 version moniker set up yet. I think that will happen soon.
Internal previews