Skip to content

Optimize seek#304

Open
eatbreads wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Optimize_seek
Open

Optimize seek#304
eatbreads wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Optimize_seek

Conversation

@eatbreads
Copy link
Collaborator

@eatbreads eatbreads commented Jan 21, 2026

Here are some reminders before you submit the pull request

  • Add tests for the change
  • Document changes
  • Reference the link of issue using fixes eloqdb/eloqstore#issue_id
  • Reference the link of RFC if exists
  • Pass ctest --test-dir build/tests/

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Performance Improvements
    • Optimized internal buffer management with reduced memory allocations for improved efficiency.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 21, 2026

Walkthrough

The changes optimize the IndexPageIter class by introducing a private member variable prev_key_ to track the previous key and refactoring buffer operations from dynamic append patterns to pre-allocated memcpy operations, reducing allocations and improving performance.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Header declaration
include/storage/mem_index_page.h
Added private member prev_key_ (std::string) to IndexPageIter class for tracking previous key state during iteration.
Implementation optimizations
src/storage/mem_index_page.cpp
Added <cstring> include; modified constructors to reserve buffer capacity for key_ and prev_key_; refactored key assembly and PeekNextKey to use memcpy into pre-allocated buffers instead of append operations; replaced local prev_key string usage with member prev_key_ for improved state management.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Poem

🐰 A buffer hops with newfound grace,
No more appends, memcpy takes their place!
With prev_key_ to mark the way,
Keys march faster, day by day! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ❌ 3
❌ Failed checks (2 warnings, 1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The PR description only contains an unchecked checklist template without any actual description of the changes, rationale, or implementation details. Add a description explaining the optimization strategy (memcpy usage, buffer pre-allocation), why these changes improve performance, and which issues/RFCs this addresses.
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'Optimize seek' is vague and generic, using a broad performance term without specifying what aspect of the seek operation is being optimized. Provide a more specific title that describes the optimization approach, such as 'Use memcpy and buffer reservation in seek operations' or 'Reduce allocations in IndexPageIter seek paths'.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch Optimize_seek

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant