Conversation
Adding a pull request template to make meeting facilitation easier .
| TODO: | ||
| - [ ] Review new comments or feedback in the RFC, and the checklist in each PR description. | ||
| - [ ] Determine if there are any new actions to take, or if any checkboxes have been completed. | ||
| - [ ] Update this document with notes. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It sounds like this template pertains only to the RFC review meetings. I think we had said that we wouldn't be taking notes for those meetings but would record outcomes on the particular RFCs. Am I remembering that correctly?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That seems fair but also then makes me wonder if there's a point to having notes at all if we're not going to write down what was reviewed/discussed?
WDYT?
| 1. Standing items: should happen every meeting | ||
| 2. Additional discussion: for any other topic to be discussed | ||
|
|
||
| #### Standing Item: General Admin |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Does this make sense in the RFC review meeting?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That's something we can decide, I think. I thought it could make sense to at least have this touchpoint in different timezones to help surface urgent issues a little more easily. It could also make sense to leave it out, so whatever we decide! 👍
2 participants
If merged, this PR would add a pull request template to simplify and standardize meeting facilitation.
Note: The template starts with an
h2element because the title of the page is already anh1.