Skip to content

Checkstyle with checkstyle 9.3#60

Merged
dmikurube merged 1 commit intogradle-version-catalogfrom
checkstyle-9.3
Feb 17, 2025
Merged

Checkstyle with checkstyle 9.3#60
dmikurube merged 1 commit intogradle-version-catalogfrom
checkstyle-9.3

Conversation

@dmikurube
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@dmikurube dmikurube requested a review from a team as a code owner February 12, 2025 08:01
@dmikurube dmikurube added this to the v0.5.0 milestone Feb 12, 2025
Copy link
Member

@hiroyuki-sato hiroyuki-sato left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM👍 I left two minor comments.

* @param client
* @param bucket
* @param key
* @return
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: Removing this part is intentional? Is this a checkstyle violation?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, it was a checkstyle violation. Checkstyle needed to fill some description for @... notations (not empty), but removing those @... notations were good.

* @param task
* @param op
* @param <T>
* @return
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: Removing this part is intentional? Is this a checkstyle violation?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ditto.

Base automatically changed from LICENSE-and-NOTICE to gradle-version-catalog February 17, 2025 03:39
@dmikurube
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks!

@dmikurube dmikurube merged commit b4191a7 into gradle-version-catalog Feb 17, 2025
1 check passed
@dmikurube dmikurube deleted the checkstyle-9.3 branch February 17, 2025 04:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants