Skip to content

Conversation

@benmccann
Copy link

An alternative to #40 for comparison which does not introduce microbundle

@LinusU
Copy link
Collaborator

LinusU commented Apr 21, 2021

I think that this is a good approach forward. While I did like Browserify, the avalanche have started and it's too late for the pebbles to vote, the ecosystem is shifting to ESM which also is the "native" module system for browsers. Also, you can get support via either esmify or babelify...

That being said, if you (@feross) think it's to early to switch I don't have a too strong opinion on this ☺️

Co-authored-by: Linus Unnebäck <linus@folkdatorn.se>
@benmccann
Copy link
Author

@feross I thought I'd check in on this. I'm happy to take another approach if you have some thoughts. Thanks!

@benmccann
Copy link
Author

@feross any thoughts on how we might best be able to support ESM?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants