Skip to content

test(Validation): Migrate validation_test.go to Ginkgo/Gomega#5647

Open
yuvraj-kolkar17 wants to merge 3 commits intofluid-cloudnative:masterfrom
yuvraj-kolkar17:test/validation-migrate
Open

test(Validation): Migrate validation_test.go to Ginkgo/Gomega#5647
yuvraj-kolkar17 wants to merge 3 commits intofluid-cloudnative:masterfrom
yuvraj-kolkar17:test/validation-migrate

Conversation

@yuvraj-kolkar17
Copy link
Contributor

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR does

Migrate validation_test.go to Ginkgo/Gomega

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

Part of #5407

Ⅲ. List the added test cases (unit test/integration test) if any, please explain if no tests are needed.

Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it

image

Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews

Signed-off-by: Yuvraj Kolkar <kolkaryuvraj2@gmail.com>
@fluid-e2e-bot
Copy link

fluid-e2e-bot bot commented Jan 31, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign yangyuliufeng for approval by writing /assign @yangyuliufeng in a comment. For more information see:The Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @yuvraj-kolkar17, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request refactors the unit tests for the IsValidMountRoot function, transitioning them to use the Ginkgo and Gomega testing frameworks. This change significantly enhances the structure and readability of the tests, making them more expressive and easier to maintain. Additionally, a minor modification was made to export an error message format string, facilitating its use within the new testing paradigm.

Highlights

  • Test Framework Migration: The unit tests for the IsValidMountRoot function in pkg/utils/validation/validation_test.go have been entirely migrated from the standard Go testing package to the Ginkgo and Gomega testing frameworks.
  • Error Message Constant Export: The invalidMountRootErrMsgFmt constant in pkg/utils/validation/validation.go has been made public by renaming it to InvalidMountRootErrMsgFmt to allow external access, specifically for use in the updated test suite.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@fluid-e2e-bot
Copy link

fluid-e2e-bot bot commented Jan 31, 2026

Hi @yuvraj-kolkar17. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a fluid-cloudnative member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request successfully migrates the tests in validation_test.go to use the Ginkgo/Gomega framework, which is a nice improvement for test readability and structure. The new tests are well-organized using Describe and DescribeTable. I've noticed a small typo in an error message that could be fixed as part of this PR. My feedback includes a suggestion for this correction.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 31, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 59.30%. Comparing base (ef245fc) to head (91060d2).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5647      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   59.23%   59.30%   +0.07%     
==========================================
  Files         444      444              
  Lines       30540    30540              
==========================================
+ Hits        18089    18113      +24     
+ Misses      10952    10925      -27     
- Partials     1499     1502       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Signed-off-by: Yuvraj Kolkar <kolkaryuvraj2@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuvraj Kolkar <kolkaryuvraj2@gmail.com>
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@yuvraj-kolkar17
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cc @cheyang @RongGu @TrafalgarZZZ

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant