Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @kunnaall04, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request addresses a bug in the ADK Toolbox's tool loading mechanism by enhancing tool compatibility. It introduces a flexible adaptation layer that ensures Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA). View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information. For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request. |
|
Response from ADK Triaging Agent Hello @kunnaall04, thank you for your contribution! Before we can review this PR, could you please:
This information is important for the reviewers to understand and verify your changes. You can find more details in our contribution guidelines. Thank you! |
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a compatibility layer to adapt tools from the ADK Toolbox by providing a _get_declaration method. The implementation monkey-patches tool instances at runtime to add this method if it's missing. The overall approach is sound. I've identified a potential bug in the logic for finding the tool declaration and provided a suggestion to fix it and make the code more robust and idiomatic.
| declaration = None | ||
| if hasattr(tool, "function_declaration"): | ||
| declaration = tool.function_declaration | ||
| elif hasattr(tool, "declaration"): | ||
| declaration = tool.declaration |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The current logic for finding the declaration has a potential bug. If tool has a function_declaration attribute that is None (or another falsy value), the code will not fall back to checking for the declaration attribute. This is because hasattr(tool, "function_declaration") will be true, declaration will be set to None, and the elif block will be skipped.
You can fix this and simplify the code by using getattr and the or operator's short-circuiting behavior. This makes the code more robust and idiomatic.
declaration = (
getattr(tool, "function_declaration", None)
or getattr(tool, "declaration", None)
)2 participants
Please ensure you have read the contribution guide before creating a pull request.
Link to Issue or Description of Change
1. Link to an existing issue (if applicable):
2. Or, if no issue exists, describe the change:
If applicable, please follow the issue templates to provide as much detail as
possible.
Problem:
A clear and concise description of what the problem is.
Solution:
A clear and concise description of what you want to happen and why you choose
this solution.
Testing Plan
Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. This is required
for all PRs that are not small documentation or typo fixes.
Unit Tests:
Please include a summary of passed
pytestresults.Manual End-to-End (E2E) Tests:
Please provide instructions on how to manually test your changes, including any
necessary setup or configuration. Please provide logs or screenshots to help
reviewers better understand the fix.
Checklist
Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.