Skip to content

[cargo-zerocopy] Pass RUSTDOCFLAGS#2987

Merged
joshlf merged 1 commit intomainfrom
G413a86267ff4384a9806de9a784407f1f5be96aa
Feb 5, 2026
Merged

[cargo-zerocopy] Pass RUSTDOCFLAGS#2987
joshlf merged 1 commit intomainfrom
G413a86267ff4384a9806de9a784407f1f5be96aa

Conversation

@joshlf
Copy link
Member

@joshlf joshlf commented Feb 5, 2026

Pass the same set of flags to RUSTFLAGS and RUSTDOCFLAGS. Some of
our tests - specifically src/doctests.rs - use cfgs which are set by
cargo-zerocopy, but these were previously not passed when evaluating
doc tests.

This follows up on #2960, which introduced this bug.


Latest Update: v2 — Compare vs v1

📚 Full Patch History

Links show the diff between the row version and the column version.

Version v1 Base
v2 vs v1 vs Base
v1 vs Base
⬇️ Download this PR

Branch

git fetch origin refs/heads/G413a86267ff4384a9806de9a784407f1f5be96aa && git checkout -b pr-G413a86267ff4384a9806de9a784407f1f5be96aa FETCH_HEAD

Checkout

git fetch origin refs/heads/G413a86267ff4384a9806de9a784407f1f5be96aa && git checkout FETCH_HEAD

Cherry Pick

git fetch origin refs/heads/G413a86267ff4384a9806de9a784407f1f5be96aa && git cherry-pick FETCH_HEAD

Pull

git pull origin refs/heads/G413a86267ff4384a9806de9a784407f1f5be96aa

Stacked PRs enabled by GHerrit.

Pass the same set of flags to `RUSTFLAGS` and `RUSTDOCFLAGS`. Some of
our tests - specifically `src/doctests.rs` - use `cfg`s which are set by
`cargo-zerocopy`, but these were previously not passed when evaluating
doc tests.

This follows up on #2960, which introduced this bug.

gherrit-pr-id: G413a86267ff4384a9806de9a784407f1f5be96aa
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @joshlf, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request resolves an issue where cfg attributes, set by cargo-zerocopy, were not being correctly propagated to doc tests, leading to test failures. By mirroring RUSTFLAGS to RUSTDOCFLAGS, the change ensures that doc tests are executed with the appropriate compilation flags, thereby fixing the previously introduced bug and improving the reliability of doc test execution.

Highlights

  • RUSTDOCFLAGS Propagation: The cargo-zerocopy tool now explicitly passes the value of the RUSTFLAGS environment variable to RUSTDOCFLAGS when invoking cargo. This ensures that cfg attributes, which are essential for certain doc tests, are correctly applied during their evaluation.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Changelog
  • tools/cargo-zerocopy/src/main.rs
    • Added a line to set the RUSTDOCFLAGS environment variable to the same value as RUSTFLAGS when cargo-zerocopy delegates to cargo.
    • Included a comment explaining the rationale behind passing RUSTFLAGS to both RUSTFLAGS and RUSTDOCFLAGS.
Activity
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@joshlf joshlf requested a review from jswrenn February 5, 2026 02:15
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request aims to fix an issue where configuration flags were not passed to doc tests. The change correctly identifies that RUSTDOCFLAGS needs to be set. However, the current implementation reuses the computed RUSTFLAGS value, which can lead to unintended side effects like overwriting a user's RUSTDOCFLAGS or passing invalid flags to rustdoc. I've provided a suggestion to make the flag handling more robust by separately constructing RUSTFLAGS and RUSTDOCFLAGS while preserving any existing values from the environment.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 91.87%. Comparing base (d296c26) to head (5ed532f).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2987   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.87%   91.87%           
=======================================
  Files          20       20           
  Lines        6057     6057           
=======================================
  Hits         5565     5565           
  Misses        492      492           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@joshlf joshlf added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 5, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 8c01bd1 Feb 5, 2026
104 checks passed
@joshlf joshlf deleted the G413a86267ff4384a9806de9a784407f1f5be96aa branch February 5, 2026 14:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants