Added format key to results_parse yc.#651
Open
dmageeLANL wants to merge 5 commits intohpc:developfrom
Open
Conversation
On the same level as 'action'. This avoids printing results with an absurd number of digits to the terminal. And facilitates displaying results as the user desires.
… script which does this in test/utils. It's a standalone executable which only acts on .py files and takes a space separated list of directories to recursively cleanse of trailing whitespace. If no argument is given it acts on the directory that contains the script file. Put it in your PATH and enjoy.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
On the same level as 'action'. This avoids printing results with an absurd number of digits to the terminal. And facilitates displaying results as the user desires.
Code review checklist:
Am I supposed to fill that out?
Anyway, I'm missing the documentation to the docs and typed function arguments. I'll fill those in, but now I want to see if it works. This feature adds a 'format' key to a result which will store and display the result as the user intends. It's inspired by this:
Which is ugly and doesn't match the format I'm visually comparing the results to, which is annoying.