Properly account for deleted or archived Reference/Links#141
Open
jim-spot wants to merge 3 commits intointercom:masterfrom
Open
Properly account for deleted or archived Reference/Links#141jim-spot wants to merge 3 commits intointercom:masterfrom
jim-spot wants to merge 3 commits intointercom:masterfrom
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
If a Contentful content type contains a reference to one or many other entries, it is possible for the reference to be undefined in cases where the referenced entry is archived or deleted from Contentful.
Example:
Let's say I have a blog post which contains a reference to one or more categories, it might look something like this pseudodata:
Let's say I delete or archive
Category 2, the resulting pseudodata returned from contetnful will look like this:Today the rendered typescript interface looks something like this:
But in order to account for the above scenario, it should look like this:
Similarly for singular references, it currently looks like this:
But in order to account for the above scenario, it should look like this:
Addresses: #86