Skip to content

hotfix for repo.py in guess_is_binary(newblob) where 'newblob' could …#186

Open
LLuke wants to merge 1 commit intojonashaag:masterfrom
LLuke:hotfix_repo.py_206_UnboundLocalError
Open

hotfix for repo.py in guess_is_binary(newblob) where 'newblob' could …#186
LLuke wants to merge 1 commit intojonashaag:masterfrom
LLuke:hotfix_repo.py_206_UnboundLocalError

Conversation

@LLuke
Copy link

@LLuke LLuke commented Jun 17, 2017

…be referenced before assignment

@LLuke
Copy link
Author

LLuke commented Jun 17, 2017

Jonas,

Thank for the excellent work in Klaus. I have noticed this issue and create the hotfix. Please feel free to accept or revise.

Regards,

Luke

dulwich_changes = self.object_store.tree_changes(parent_tree, commit.tree)
for (oldpath, newpath), (oldmode, newmode), (oldsha, newsha) in dulwich_changes:
summary['nfiles'] += 1
newblob = oldblob = Blob.from_string(b'')
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey, thanks for the patch! I'd prefer this to be expressed in a more explicit way, and without the redundant Blob.from_string below.

How about something along the lines of:

if oldsha is None:
    # File was newly created [newsha: deleted]
    oldblob = Blob.from_string(b'')
elif oldsha not in self.object_store:
    # newsha/oldsha are probably related to submodules.
    # Dulwich will handle that.
    oldblob = Blob.from_string(b'')
else:
    oldblob = self.object_store[oldsha]

And the same duplicated for newsha/newblob.

(Note: Not sure if None is the only false-y value the `sha variables can have?)

@jonashaag
Copy link
Owner

jonashaag commented Feb 14, 2018

Sorry, somehow GitHub didn't submit my review. It was pending for 6 months...

@LLuke
Copy link
Author

LLuke commented Apr 23, 2018

Your suggestion is better. :-)

Also Apologize for late reply. Somehow gmail chose to send all my github threads to spam while I'm working mostly off the web interface these days.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants