Skip to content

Conversation

@justinsb
Copy link
Contributor

@justinsb justinsb commented Jan 29, 2026

  • tests: switch wait from polling to watch for more accurate timings

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 29, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: justinsb

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jan 29, 2026

Deploy Preview for agent-sandbox canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 8bb497c
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/agent-sandbox/deploys/6986038df057d70008ec9ff1

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 29, 2026
@justinsb justinsb force-pushed the use_watch_for_wait branch 2 times, most recently from 9ae12e5 to 0238622 Compare January 29, 2026 04:17
}),
}
require.NoError(t, tc.WaitForObject(t.Context(), sandboxObj, p...))
require.NoError(t, tc.PollUntilObject(sandboxObj, p...))
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Switched because this test seems to fail if we use the (faster) Watch version


// Wait for the pod to be ready
require.NoError(testingT, testContext.WaitForObject(testingT.Context(), podObj, predicates.ReadyConditionIsTrue))
require.NoError(testingT, testContext.PollUntilObject(podObj, predicates.ReadyConditionIsTrue))
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This test also fails if we use Watch

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jan 30, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jan 31, 2026
@justinsb justinsb force-pushed the use_watch_for_wait branch 2 times, most recently from 1b3e14c to 02ed71f Compare February 4, 2026 13:47
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Feb 6, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Feb 6, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Feb 10, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

PR needs rebase.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants