test(util): improve test coverage for util/print-util.go to 100%#89
Open
yuvraj-kolkar17 wants to merge 1 commit intokubeslice:masterfrom
Open
test(util): improve test coverage for util/print-util.go to 100%#89yuvraj-kolkar17 wants to merge 1 commit intokubeslice:masterfrom
yuvraj-kolkar17 wants to merge 1 commit intokubeslice:masterfrom
Conversation
Signed-off-by: yuvraj Kolkar <kolkaryuvraj2@gmail.com>
Author
Contributor
|
@yuvraj-kolkar17 There is already an open PR for print-util.go |
Author
Thanks for pointing that out, @Alokzh.
|
gourishkb
approved these changes
Aug 26, 2025
Contributor
gourishkb
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, thanks @yuvraj-kolkar17
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.

Description
Added complete test suite for print-util.go achieving 100% code coverage.
Implemented tests for Printf, Fatalf functions and Unicode constants with
proper output verification and edge case handling.
Part of the issue #46
How Has This Been Tested?
Test Commands
Checklist:
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?