Skip to content

Robust response abacus#2188

Merged
aarondr77 merged 4 commits intodevfrom
robust-response-abacus
Feb 18, 2026
Merged

Robust response abacus#2188
aarondr77 merged 4 commits intodevfrom
robust-response-abacus

Conversation

@aarondr77
Copy link
Member

@aarondr77 aarondr77 commented Feb 18, 2026

Description

Testing

Please provide a list of the ways you can "access" or use the functionality. Please try and be exhaustive here, and make sure that you test everything you list.

  • I have tested this on real data that is reasonable and large
  • If I changed the interaction with JupyterLab, I tested that it does not break other programs (like VS Code), and tested that it works "multiple times" in the same notebook.

Documentation

Note if any new documentation needs to addressed or reviewed.


Note

Medium Risk
Touches LLM response formatting and tool-invocation prompt contracts; mistakes could cause malformed responses or tool parsing failures across providers, though changes are small and localized.

Overview
Fixes Abacus JSON response formatting by switching the Abacus response_format from {"type":"json"} to {"type":"json_object"} in open_ai_utils.get_open_ai_completion_function_params, while keeping full JSON-schema formatting for non-Abacus providers.

Hardens agent prompt examples to valid JSON by updating tool/example payloads (e.g., cell_update, run_all_cells, scratchpad, ask_user_question, finished_task) to use double-quoted keys/strings and consistent schemas (including adding fields like code_summary/cell_type in the smart debug example).

Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit 9189e7f. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 18, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
monorepo Ready Ready Preview, Comment Feb 18, 2026 9:38pm

Request Review

@aarondr77 aarondr77 merged commit 118ac42 into dev Feb 18, 2026
22 of 29 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

Comments